| From | Message |
Fortune50
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
11/11/2005
10:19:21
|
 Subject: 1992 Dodge Dakota Warrior?
IP: Logged
Message:
Is this for real?
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=4589230986&fromMakeTrack=true
I'm just trying to find out more about this truck. Does anyone know anything about them? If so, please post.
|
71firebird
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
11/11/2005
10:27:46
| RE: 1992 Dodge Dakota Warrior?
IP: Logged
Message:
google found this:
http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/Downs/6071/warrior.html
Check it out,I don't know what's there though cause my work pc has it blocked :(
I don't know if it's real or not but it's ugly.
|
Jasonb61
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
11/11/2005
15:19:05
| RE: 1992 Dodge Dakota Warrior?
IP: Logged
Message:
hehe, I must have a thing for ugly dodges (see rampage post)... honestly, that bed does not belong with the front end of that truck IMO... 92-96 daks just dont look 'rugged' enough to have a step side box..
I do like the CB in the dash... pretty nifty if you ask me. I believe it was produced like that though.. Only a few of them though
|
daddio
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
11/12/2005
19:27:25
| RE: 1992 Dodge Dakota Warrior?
IP: Logged
Message:
i'd rather this one: http://classytrucks.usa-hero.com/Dodge2005DakotaWarrior.html
|
toolfan
GenIII
11/18/2005
00:05:39
|  RE: 1992 Dodge Dakota Warrior?
IP: Logged
Message:
'92 - not a good year
some mods to slow it down!
|
GraphiteDak
GenIII
11/18/2005
01:25:20
| RE: 1992 Dodge Dakota Warrior?
IP: Logged
Message:
Where those for real???
Looks like and ugly a$$ Chevy bed!
|
Jasonb61
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
11/18/2005
02:26:56
| RE: 1992 Dodge Dakota Warrior?
IP: Logged
Message:
Yep... I dont like the bed.. Maybe on an older truck... Like the old Rams or something... with dual stacks.. that would look cool..
As for you toolfan... 92 not being a 'good year' is an opinion and it would be VERY helpful if you would elaborate on it rather than randomly saying it. You need something to back the opinion up if you want it to have any affect...
|
GenIIDefender
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
11/18/2005
17:49:42
| RE: 1992 Dodge Dakota Warrior?
IP: Logged
Message:
1992-1993 are some of the best years. They have larger Exhaust manifolds and though I haven't been able to verify it for myself I hear that the cam is a little more aggressive also. Not only that but Gen II's weigh less than their Gen III brothers and a lot less than that brick introduced in 2005.
|
Kowalski
GenIII
11/19/2005
07:54:43
| RE: 1992 Dodge Dakota Warrior?
IP: Logged
Message:
That's the real scoop on '92; actually one of the better years.
Lead, follow, or get out of the way
|
dodge dave
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
9/30/2010
13:00:15
|  RE: 1992 Dodge Dakota Warrior?
IP: Logged
Message:
i have a warrior brought it new in 92 and it has 154k miles still runs great as for the fiberglass bed it been refiberglass once and in the process again. the truck has to much power and makes the bed twist and causes cracks. it is all stock. 318 cid. 230 hp factory. it has been and still is a great dodge truck. has won a show or two in it day and will again when finished, and painted (stock black with gold pins and decals.) less stress cracks then corvetts. but they still need fixed to keep the look.
|
| | P 1 |
|
Post a reply to this message:
Username Registration: Optional
All visitors are allowed to post messages
|
