From | Message |
toolfan Dodge Dakota JOIN HERE
10/20/2005 20:44:56
|
Subject: 5.2 dak vs 5.0 mustang IP: Logged
Message: my friend and i are going to race and we both think it will be close. the mustang is a 97 stick and is stock. my truck 318 cc intake muffler. who will win????
|
Sam Dodge Dakota JOIN HERE
10/20/2005 21:22:45
| RE: 5.2 dak vs 5.0 mustang IP: Logged
Message: I think he has a 4.6 if he has a 97' stang. You'll lose.
|
8banger GenIII
10/20/2005 21:28:27
| RE: 5.2 dak vs 5.0 mustang IP: Logged
Message: 97 is a 4.6 and it is rated at 225HP.. the last 5.0 was 95 and it would smoke you.
You have a better chance against the 4.6 as long as it's not a cobra dohc4.6 which is 305hp.
I am gonna give it to the stang just because your HP/TQ numbers are pretty close but you are weighing at around 500lbs. heavier.
03 Dakota 4X4 QC SportPlus 4.7L 3.55 LSD AWD Superchipped, 2Chamber Flowmaster Dumped, K&N Drop-in, 2"Torsion Lift
MY 4X4'S BAPTISM
|
toolfan Dodge Dakota JOIN HERE
10/20/2005 21:56:02
| RE: 5.2 dak vs 5.0 mustang IP: Logged
Message: alright we raced and it has a 5.0 so its not 97 i was guessing the year.
the first race i won by 2 truck lengths. my friend doesn't know how to drive a stick.
so my other friend drove.
i had him of the line for lack of traction but he didn't catch me till 40mph and than we ran side by side until 60mph when i shifted he began to pull away. but in the end he beat me by .30 sec not to bad for a heavy ass truck that has just 10 more hp.
which engine is better for preformance the 4.6 or 5.0? we have the 4.6 in the explorer and it would give my truck a ran for its money.
|
Sam Dodge Dakota JOIN HERE
10/20/2005 22:32:04
| RE: 5.2 dak vs 5.0 mustang IP: Logged
Message: The new 4.6's would smoke the old 5.0's (stock vs. stock.) I think the new v6 mustang would give the 5.0's a run for their money.
|
jayb Dodge Dakota JOIN HERE
10/20/2005 22:49:57
| RE: 5.2 dak vs 5.0 mustang IP: Logged
Message: a new v6 stang will probably smoke a old 92ish 5.0L. those v6's are rated at like 200+hp
|
toolfan Dodge Dakota JOIN HERE
10/21/2005 01:22:17
| RE: 5.2 dak vs 5.0 mustang IP: Logged
Message: i doubt that. i have driven a 02 mustang v6 and it was pathetic.
|
Mikes99Dakota GenIII
10/21/2005 09:46:06
| RE: 5.2 dak vs 5.0 mustang IP: Logged
Message: I have came close to a 98 mustang with
3.73s
Steeda Tri-ax Short throw
Shortie Headers
Bigger TB
5 spd.
He beat me with my current mods after 78-80 mph. I got the low-end he has the low-end/high end
Pretty badass IMO just a couple of bolt-ons and they are quick as sh1t. But for the old 5.0s dont make me laugh...hehe
1999 RC Auto 5.2L Mopar PPH, Magnaflow 3" w/cut-out, 3.90s/Suregrip, 50mm Fastman TB
Track Times: 9.47 @ 72.21mph 14.89 @ 91.33 mph
|
toolfan Dodge Dakota JOIN HERE
10/22/2005 02:23:46
| RE: 5.2 dak vs 5.0 mustang IP: Logged
Message: race another mustang and this one was a 91 5.0. roll on from 50mph stay even to 60mph than he pulled away, as he should.
|
Mikes99Dakota GenIII
10/22/2005 21:14:46
| RE: 5.2 dak vs 5.0 mustang IP: Logged
Message: Going from a roll isnt much of a race either...I still outweigh him by a bit.
1999 RC Auto 5.2L Mopar PPH, Magnaflow 3" w/cut-out, 3.90s/Suregrip, 50mm Fastman TB
Track Times: 9.47 @ 72.21mph 14.89 @ 91.33 mph
|
toolfan Dodge Dakota JOIN HERE
10/23/2005 00:46:36
| RE: 5.2 dak vs 5.0 mustang IP: Logged
Message: were is you rear end from if it is a 3.90? is it factory or is out of a jeep or something?
|
jayb Dodge Dakota JOIN HERE
10/23/2005 10:04:21
| RE: 5.2 dak vs 5.0 mustang IP: Logged
Message: i got really drunk last night.....
|
3.92 Dodge Dakota JOIN HERE
10/23/2005 10:55:00
| RE: 5.2 dak vs 5.0 mustang IP: Logged
Message: This guy is so clueless he thinks the 5.2 is king of the hill just because its what he has. Obviously he has 3.92 gears, just a bit numb.
|
Mikes99Dakota GenIII
10/25/2005 11:23:37
| RE: 5.2 dak vs 5.0 mustang IP: Logged
Message: Whose clueless??? Obviously you dont know what your talking about. I never said I was the king of the hill...race what you bring and if you get beat, than tough sh1t!
1999 RC Auto 5.2L Mopar PPH, Magnaflow 3" w/cut-out, 3.90s/Suregrip, 50mm Fastman TB
Track Times: 9.47 @ 72.21mph 14.89 @ 91.33 mph
|
toolfan Dodge Dakota JOIN HERE
10/25/2005 11:55:33
| RE: 5.2 dak vs 5.0 mustang IP: Logged
Message: what rear end MIkE?
|
intensedak39 *GenIII*
10/25/2005 14:09:16
| RE: 5.2 dak vs 5.0 mustang IP: Logged
Message: 3.92 is a factory gear available for the 9.25
there is a 3.90 aftermarket set available for the 8.25", which mike has.
and my 89 dakota has 3.90 gears from the factory.
|
Mikes99Dakota GenIII
10/26/2005 01:31:39
| RE: 5.2 dak vs 5.0 mustang IP: Logged
Message: Sorry ToolFan, yup 3.90 gears and 8 1/4" rear-end.
Still a decent rear but will have to upgrade when i dip into the 13s with a small stall...kinda afraid of the consequences of the 8.25"
1999 RC Auto 5.2L Mopar PPH, Magnaflow 3" w/cut-out, 3.90s/Suregrip, 50mm Fastman TB
Track Times: 9.47 @ 72.21mph 14.89 @ 91.33 mph
|
intensedak39 *GenIII*
10/26/2005 03:36:14
| RE: 5.2 dak vs 5.0 mustang IP: Logged
Message: so you got a couple more years before you need that 9.25", eh?
lol!!
the 97+ 8.25 can take a lot more abuse than the pre-97 8.25 can.
|
Fed Dodge Dakota JOIN HERE
10/26/2005 11:24:02
| RE: 5.2 dak vs 5.0 mustang IP: Logged
Message: what kind of consequences are you guys talking about!?
completely falling apart or what?
|
toolfor trade Dodge Dakota JOIN HERE
10/26/2005 17:04:06
| RE: 5.2 dak vs 5.0 mustang IP: Logged
Message: i want to up grade to the 3.90s with a LSD or Posi. have 3.55 open diff :(
where you impressed by the add performance of the 3.90s MiKes99dakota????
how much $$$$ was the 3.90s MiKE?????
|
intensedak39 *GenIII*
10/26/2005 17:24:09
| RE: 5.2 dak vs 5.0 mustang IP: Logged
Message: check out www.summitracing.com
they have 3.91 Richmond Gear sets for about $289 (more expensive then some)
also have 3.90 Superior Axle Gear sets for about $229.
www.4wheelparts.com also carries Motive gear which is a little bit cheaper. I bought a set of 4.10's from them for $150 i believe.
|
| P 1 Next Page>> |