From | Message |
Chris Dodge Dakota JOIN HERE
7/26/2005 18:38:45
|
Subject: cam upgrade IP: Logged
Message: hello,
When upgrading the cams to either the krc 200's or 206's is it necessary to run premium fuel (91+ octance)
Thanks
Chris
|
Gaston Dodge Dakota JOIN HERE
7/27/2005 00:29:31
| RE: cam upgrade IP: Logged
Message: Why would it?
Changing the cams does not change your engine's compression ratio, ignition timing or air/fuel ratio.
|
gen1dak Dodge Dakota JOIN HERE
7/27/2005 01:49:56
| RE: cam upgrade IP: Logged
Message: Actually, changing a cam can (an usually will) change the effective (note the term...effective, not static CR) compression ratio of an engine. It involves cylinder filling, and is also affected by overlap. Typical hi-torque units, for example, boost cylinder pressure (thanks to improved cylinder filling) in midrange rpms. The effective CR increases in this range. However, usually, the biggest issue involves the ignition timing. If the engine is already running close to detonation tolerance with a given setup, then receives a cam upgrade, it could potentially have detonation where it did not before. The main solutions are increased fuel octane, cooler thermostat (but not less than 180 degrees), and reduced ignition timing.
|
FLDak Dodge Dakota JOIN HERE
7/27/2005 14:43:29
| RE: cam upgrade IP: Logged
Message: I have had the HO cams and now have the KRC 206 cams, still running 87 octane.
|
Gaston Dodge Dakota JOIN HERE
7/27/2005 20:05:30
| RE: cam upgrade IP: Logged
Message: Oops.
You're right, gen1dak.
I answered in haste, and at the time thought a difference in cylinder filling insignificant. I had not considered the ignition timing aspect of it, though.
Well put.
|
2003 4.7 Dodge Dakota JOIN HERE
7/27/2005 22:22:06
| RE: cam upgrade IP: Logged
Message: To add, after I swapped to the HO cams I did some real world tests and found that fuel milage was better with 89 oct. Wasn't much, 1/2-1 mpg more. But it was consistent.
May be that it is burning more effiecently at the cams effective engine rpm's?
|
gen1dak Dodge Dakota JOIN HERE
7/28/2005 20:43:33
| RE: cam upgrade IP: Logged
Message: 2003 4.7. Typically, when you see something like that (better mileage with a higher octane vs lower octane, all else being equal) you are experiencing a very mild detonation on the lower octane. You may not be able to hear it, but it's happening, and this is stealing some power, and costing mileage.
Gaston, thanks.
|
2003 4.7 Dodge Dakota JOIN HERE
7/28/2005 23:36:25
| RE: cam upgrade IP: Logged
Message: True, I do live in Florida and it's pretty damn hot. Mild detonation worries were what made me start running 89 anyway.
Strang though , I told one of my friends about it and he showed no improvement in a Jeep GC.
non H.O.
Shows how different every engine is huh?
|
gen1dak Dodge Dakota JOIN HERE
7/29/2005 00:01:29
| RE: cam upgrade IP: Logged
Message: Yep. Even two that came off the same production line, same day can show very different personalities.
|
| P 1 |
|
Post a reply to this message:
Username Registration: Optional All visitors are allowed to post messages
|