| From | Message |
Thor
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
7/06/2005
15:52:41
|
 Subject: 5.9 vs. 5.9RT
IP: Logged
Message:
Are there any differences in the 5.9 that is in my 2001 quad cab 4x4 sport vs. the 5.9 that came in the R/T trucks?
|
me
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
7/06/2005
16:24:55
| RE: 5.9 vs. 5.9RT
IP: Logged
Message:
NOPE
|
Sneezer
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
7/06/2005
17:01:49
| RE: 5.9 vs. 5.9RT
IP: Logged
Message:
No difference internally. The RT had a slightly better exhaust, but that is it. Was good for an extra 5hp. 5.9s in the quadcab and Durango were rated at 245hp, RT got 250.
|
Thor
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
7/06/2005
17:05:54
| RE: 5.9 vs. 5.9RT
IP: Logged
Message:
So my Gibson cat back would make up the extra 5 hp right? The R/T was just basically a trim package then?
|
daddio
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
7/06/2005
17:39:51
| RE: 5.9 vs. 5.9RT
IP: Logged
Message:
pretty much. other than the QC's the only way you got a 5.9 is in the R/T.
|
jayb
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
7/06/2005
19:15:05
| RE: 5.9 vs. 5.9RT
IP: Logged
Message:
5.9 is a gas pig. 5.2L has all the power you need in a midsize. i say if you want a hot rod, get one.
|
daddio
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
7/06/2005
21:52:48
| RE: 5.9 vs. 5.9RT
IP: Logged
Message:
i disagree jayb. if you want a "hot rod", drop a 340 in that puppy.
|
trukguy
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
7/06/2005
22:52:44
| RE: 5.9 vs. 5.9RT
IP: Logged
Message:
jayb - there's no such thing as "all the power you need". There's also no such thing as "too much"!
|
jayb
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
7/06/2005
23:24:19
| RE: 5.9 vs. 5.9RT
IP: Logged
Message:
i agree, but a dodge dakota is a pickup truck. not a GTO. i dunno.... to each his own i guess.
|
Thor
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
7/07/2005
16:01:10
| RE: 5.9 vs. 5.9RT
IP: Logged
Message:
If I was concerned about gas mileage, I would not have bought a 360! I made the mistake of sacrificing power for milage once, I won't do it again!
|
| | P 1 |
|
Post a reply to this message:
Username Registration: Optional
All visitors are allowed to post messages
|
