| From | Message |
Harebawl
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
5/03/2005
16:13:55
|
 Subject: 4.7l vs. 5.2l torque
IP: Logged
Message:
Does anyone have hp/torque graphs of these 2 engines, I have seached a little and cannot find one. I am real curious, because it seems my 1999 318 had WAY more low end torque towing than the new 4.7l.
Even a link would be of great help!
Thanks in advance!!!!!
|
Northern VA
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
5/03/2005
19:39:00
| RE: 4.7l vs. 5.2l torque
IP: Logged
Message:
This info would be VERY helpful for me too b/c I'll be looking for a V8 4x4 Dak soon. When I test drove a 4.7, it felt sluggish, and everyone here said it probably needed a tune up. I've always heard that the 5.2 has the low end and the 4.7 has the upper end.
|
tony gotto
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
5/04/2005
11:31:19
| RE: 4.7l vs. 5.2l torque
IP: Logged
Message:
also looking foward to a 4.7 2005 purchase, any drawbacks or negative info . I understand some problems found with the 3.9 .Whats the best tranny hook-up with the 4.7 and I'm interested in the posi rear in stock form any news on that? Thanks Tony.
|
IntenseDak39
*GenIII*
5/04/2005
11:58:31
| RE: 4.7l vs. 5.2l torque
IP: Logged
Message:
i dynoed my 5.2 'rango with some friends 4.7 'rangos and my 'rango beat them in top and bottom end. I've got my graph and i'll see if i can aquire theirs.
i do know that mine made 184 rwhp @ 3950 rpms and 261 rwtq @ 2850 rpms.
torque stayed above 250 from 2000 rpms to 4000 rpms.
2000 hp 100 tq 250
2500 hp 125 tq 257
3000 hp 150 tq 261
3500 hp 175 tq 260
4000 hp 184 tq 250
4500 hp 175 tq 200
that's a stock 2000 5.2 Durango, rear wheel numbers
torque curve is pretty flat until it hits 4000 rpms and takes a little dive.
|
| | P 1 |
|
Post a reply to this message:
Username Registration: Optional
All visitors are allowed to post messages
|
