Forums
Forum Tools
|
 |
01:42:27 - 02/05/2025
V8 Dakotas
| From | Message |
j-mac
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
6/20/2004
02:32:11
|
 Subject: intake porting vs M1
IP: Logged
Message:
I'd like to get some feedback back on porting the stock intake vs the m1. I am capable of the porting, but is it worth the savings? If so, any one have tips for the modifications as far as tolerances, etc.? or anything else?
|
00 RT/BC
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
6/20/2004
03:07:15
| RE: intake porting vs M1
IP: Logged
Message:
Might be helpful for those in the know to understand what motor you're working with.
|
prplegas-eatr
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
6/20/2004
03:45:14
| RE: intake porting vs M1
IP: Logged
Message:
im porting a beer barrel as we speak, i didnt find any info on this, i just cut the plane out, cut the runners back and polished them. i know it will be alot better on the upper rpm's, i heard with this design, you still have the low end torque too. i plan on buying the 1.7 roller rockers since im not doing a cam, so i decided to go this route instead of the m1. if anyone has any info on porting a beer barrel, please help a brother out! thanks!
|
IntenseDak39
*GenIII*
6/20/2004
09:22:19
| RE: intake porting vs M1
IP: Logged
Message:
https://www.dodgedakota.net/boards/v6/9314.html
6.6 Lt. Big Block, 727 TF shift kit, 452 heads, edelbrock 750 cfm, .513/.513 284/300 crower cam, comp cams springs, comp cams pushrods, 1.5 roller rockers, dp intake, mopar ignition, mopar windage tray, dual exhaust w/ 40 series flowmasters, 4.10 gears, coilover drag suspension, approx, 3500 lbs
|
j-mac
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
6/20/2004
19:52:52
| RE: intake porting vs M1
IP: Logged
Message:
its a 318 magnum.
|
| | P 1 |
|
Post a reply to this message:
Username Registration: Optional
All visitors are allowed to post messages
|
|
