Dodge Dakota ForumDodge Dakota PhotosDodgeDakota.net Membership
  Forums   Forum Tools
00:37:44 - 12/20/2024

V8 Dakotas
FromMessage
sully034x4
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
 Email

6/04/2003
18:23:17

Subject: exhaust, 2.5"or 3.0"
IP: Logged

Message:
I just got a new 2003 4.7, and from what i've read hear the way to go is to keep it one pipe and stay away from dual exhaust.(lose low end torque, and no gain in HP). I want to swap out mufflers(flowmaster delta flow 40 series) but i was wondering if i should keep the stock size 2.5" or bump it up to 3.0"out. Any input or comments will help thanx.




pete
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE


6/04/2003
19:54:49

RE: exhaust, 2.5
IP: Logged

Message:
unless you get bandrel bent tubes.. go with 3".. when they bend it, that 2.5 gets tiny.



pete
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE


6/05/2003
00:30:09

RE: exhaust, 2.5
IP: Logged

Message:
'scuse me, i meant mandrel



Big Al
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
 Email

6/05/2003
02:29:44

RE: exhaust, 2.5
IP: Logged

Message:
You should not go to the 3" exhaust...stick w/
the 2.5 Just as with putting a dual exhaust on
your Dak, putting 3" pipes on it will cause for a
loss in backpressure and therefor a loss in
torque. There might be a tiny-tiny Hp gain, but
you will lose torque. And in my opinion, the
torque is the funnest part of the V8.

Hope this helps...BA.



Big Al
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
 Email

6/05/2003
02:32:56

RE: exhaust, 2.5
IP: Logged

Message:
You should not go to the 3" exhaust...stick w/
the 2.5 Just as with putting a dual exhaust on
your Dak, putting 3" pipes on it will cause for a
loss in backpressure and therefor a loss in
torque. There might be a tiny-tiny Hp gain, but
you will lose torque. And in my opinion, the
torque is the funnest part of the V8.

Hope this helps...BA.



gtm
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
 Email

6/05/2003
02:58:30

RE: exhaust, 2.5
IP: Logged

Message:
I have a 2001 4.7 and all I did was change the muffler.....used a dynomax ultra-flo p/n 17289. Boy does it sound great. It isn't to loud at idle but when you open it up it sounds like a race car.....cool.

It is a 2.5 inlet and outlet and the muffler is slightly shorter....about 2 inches. As for the mandrel bent pipes...well if you look at the pipe ahead of the muffler is mandrel bent. It is the tailpipe that isn't.

I doubt that changing the tailpipe to a mandrel bent one is going to do anything but lighten your wallet. Also 2.5 vs 3.....again using a 3" pipe I think you would be hard pressed to see any gain at all. If you had a full race truck perhaps some benefit, but on a stock or slightly modified engine I believe you are wasting your money.

Hope this helps.




toolman
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE


6/06/2003
01:33:16

RE: exhaust, 2.5
IP: Logged

Message:
I have a 2002 4.7 with a home made intake and a Magna Flow single 3" cat back. I tow a 2000lb trailer 80% of the time and noticed a 3-4 mpg gain with the two mods. It also seems to accelerate quicker and definately sounds better. I went with Magna Flow insted of Flowmaster because it was cheaper and had a lifetime warranty versus 1 year. Hope that helps.



   P 1


Post a reply to this message:

Username Registration: Optional
All visitors are allowed to post messages


Name:
Email:
Notify me when I get a reply to my message:Yes  No

Icons:            

          

Subject:
Message:
 



Home | Forums | Members | Pictures | Contact Us

This site is in no way affiliated with Chrysler or any of its subsidiaries.