From | Message |
Ian Dodge Dakota JOIN HERE
11/21/2002 17:25:47
|
Subject: what's the consensus, is ho intake worth IP: Logged
Message: For all of you who first installed the cams then the intake, was the increased horsepower enough to justify the loss in torque...right now I'm leaning towards just the cams cause torque is what is fun (I don't really race just like to punch it now and again). Is there a signficant enough horsepower gain from the intake to make it fun on the streets or is it really just for the track?
|
Wes GenIII
11/21/2002 19:01:39
| RE: what's the consensus, is ho intake worth IP: Logged
Message: I would just stay with the cams. I did both at the same time and regret it. Yes, it has more power now. I would rather have the factory intake on and have the torque even lower in the rpm range. Mine is an auto with 3.55 gears so I will probably put the factory intake back on so since I never really get to high in the rpm range.
HO cams & intake, 70mm F&B, Z-tube, Borla headers, Gibson exhaust
|
CW GenIII
11/21/2002 19:37:24
| RE: what's the consensus, is ho intake worth IP: Logged
Message: I am always useing power in the 3000 to 4000 I like the intake and will be taking it a step further as well.
4.7 HO, CW style 2001 4.7 5sp 3.92 LSD Ported 68mm TB, IAT adjuster, 3" flowmaster cat back, TPS @ .76V, 4" Z-tube, Roadmaster active suspention, Removed Third cat, Electric fan Convertion, HO cams, Robert shaw 180 therm, HO intake manifold.
|
Michael DakotaEnthusiast
11/21/2002 19:40:03
| RE: what's the consensus, is ho intake worth IP: Logged
Message: I like my setup, did both at the same time. Runs like a bat out of hell. Definitly worth it. IMO
Z-Tube, R/T Rims, SSB Rear Disc Conversion, Alpine Head-Unit, Infinity Kappa Speakers, SilverStar Headlights, HO Cams & Intake installed.
Got H.O. ?
|
KRC Tech Dodge Dakota JOIN HERE
11/21/2002 19:53:53
| RE: what's the consensus, is ho intake worth IP: Logged
Message: I would recommend it Ian, it is a great easy to do cheap modification that responds well.
|
Dr.Dakota Dodge Dakota JOIN HERE
11/22/2002 11:07:16
| RE: what's the consensus, is ho intake worth IP: Logged
Message: I am really happy with my Cams and Intake. The way I figure it with a cold air intake and the big 9" K&N filter lets get as much air through that engine as possible. If you are going to do cams it only makes sense to do the intake too so the cams can have all the air they need...along with a 3" exhaust and hi-flow muffler. I don't necesarily beleive all this hoopla about the cam giving you more torque and the intake robbing it (or vice-versa..whatever) they are designed to work with each other.
I got boat loads of torque, a really hi peak power, it revs higher, it gets to the higher rpms quicker AND it seems to have given me 10% more mpg....do them both, you won't regret it!
|
Demon Dakota DakotaEnthusiast
11/22/2002 14:16:12
| RE: what's the consensus, is ho intake worth IP: Logged
Message: You must do both to fully realize the potential of the HO Cams. If you don't, you're wasting the top end of your power band. Plus, look how much quicker the RPM's build. More power and better efficiency. How can that be bad?
K&N Drop in AF True Dual exhaust and removed third cat HO Cams & HO Intake Modified TB Autolite 3923 Plugs TPS @ .76 VDC IAT Adjuster Mod
|
| P 1 |
|
Post a reply to this message:
Username Registration: Optional All visitors are allowed to post messages
|