Dodge Dakota ForumDodge Dakota PhotosDodgeDakota.net Membership
  Forums   Forum Tools
01:29:21 - 12/20/2024

V8 Dakotas
FromMessage
03kota
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE


10/13/2002
19:52:30

Subject: K&N FIPK Vs. 360 air intakez
IP: Logged

Message:
I recently got my 2003 4.7 dakota and im looking for a good intake that will add HP. Ive been seaqrching for a while and i know i dont want a homebrew but the two major ones im debating about are the K&N FIPK and the 360 air intake. they both use a KN cone but the 360 dosent have a heat shield and the kn does big price diffrence though. I need some help on deciding, any suggestions PLEASE HELP
Thanks



Cotharyus
GenIII
 Email User Profile


10/13/2002
21:13:19

RE: K&N FIPK Vs. 360 air intakez
IP: Logged

Message:
I paid the extra for the K&N - that doesn't mean its better, it just means that when it came to spending my money on something, I bought from the company with the golden reputation. No matter what intake you get, remove the rubber flap.

2001 QC 4x4, 4.7,5 spd, LSD, 255/70-15's, K&N Gen II Intake, Robert Shaw 180 Stat, Hanson Industries custom front bumper, Highflow cat

Dr. Dakota
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE


10/13/2002
21:35:26

RE: K&N FIPK Vs. 360 air intakez
IP: Logged

Message:
The 360AirIntakez looks better than the K&N...Reputation is small potatoes for a mod this simple and effective. Cost may be an issue...but it comes down to the sheer beauty of the thing, 360 has got it hands down. The only thing close is the Z-Tube, but I think since the bends are less drastic than the Z-Tube, the 360 has to get better performance.



   P 1


Post a reply to this message:

Username Registration: Optional
All visitors are allowed to post messages


Name:
Email:
Notify me when I get a reply to my message:Yes  No

Icons:            

          

Subject:
Message:
 



Home | Forums | Members | Pictures | Contact Us

This site is in no way affiliated with Chrysler or any of its subsidiaries.