From | Message |
CTD5.9 Dodge Dakota JOIN HERE
3/10/2008 10:37:27
|
Subject: RE: dakota vs mustang IP: Logged
Message: When you are making moderate power with your cummins a built transmission is not an option. When you get there you will see. There was a day when I had a Edge hot drag comp some stg4 jammers (jammer stg4 are 125hp/250fpt DDP stg4 are 150/300) and a converter and my truck ran 14.20's on a good day. Now I can pull the firebird to the track run low 10's with that, unhook the trailer and run low 13.s with the tow rig. So where did I fall short on the little womans dak? Im sure it's junk yours is way faster with those shiny chrome muffler bearings.
|
BS flag Dodge Dakota JOIN HERE
3/10/2008 16:40:25
| RE: dakota vs mustang IP: Logged
Message: I wasn't aware that Superchips had an aplication for the HO 4.7. Anyone else notice that ?
|
CTD5.9 Dodge Dakota JOIN HERE
3/10/2008 18:01:32
| RE: dakota vs mustang IP: Logged
Message: I suppose your not aware that the H.O. will run with the computer in the dakota, 02 H.O. has the same tone rings on the crank & cams. Wow I must be a Fn magician. Anyone notice that?
|
CTD5.9 Dodge Dakota JOIN HERE
3/10/2008 18:19:19
| RE: dakota vs mustang IP: Logged
Message: Ooops I said cams, only the passenger side cam has a tone ring. I dont want to confuse anyone. Yes it runs great with this setup. I also have magnum 5.9 R/T injectors for a 01 and cooler plugs much cooler plugs for the bottle.
|
GraphiteDak GenIII
3/11/2008 00:03:08
| RE: dakota vs mustang IP: Logged
Message: Sorry CTD5.9, but on your first post you made it sound like your trucks were stock. I knew there was no way in heck!
I called the NO2 on your 4.7, LOL!
Glad you pointed out that you swapped in the HO. Because they didn't come stock until recently.
Maybe you should go turbo on her next 4.7 HO?
|
CTD5.9 Dodge Dakota JOIN HERE
3/11/2008 00:13:59
| RE: dakota vs mustang IP: Logged
Message: I have talked to her about doing a turbo on it and she says no. She likes the power on the motor and the option to flip the switch when at the track. I have a couple turbos around that would work good on it too. I plan on selling it within the next year or so and dont like to pawn off Junk. With my luck I would sell it and it would go boom, then im that guy. So my plan is to assemble this other engine swap them and sell it.
|
Super bee GenI
3/11/2008 23:41:58
| RE: dakota vs mustang IP: Logged
Message: HTT64/14
ok, for some reason i thought you meant HTT64 compounded with the HX 40
not quite sure WHY, but i did
ANYWAY
you need to also realize that my cummins is a far cry from your cummins as far as the injection system goes
ive driven an 01 and mine stock would KILL a 01 stock, not even a competition
305 hp and 555 tq stock vs what 245hp and 460 tq?
i have heard they have different pistons, and a few other goodies to pump them up, as well as tuning.
So me adding 125 hp chip is a bit different than you adding a 125 chip. You 60 hp out of the gate to get to mine stock. But i digress.
so i put on a hot juice and, mind you, if i had built tranny (what i meant by a descent tranny) and a lift pump im sure i could get low 14.
In fact there was a guy over at dodgetruck world that ran a low 14 with his juice on lvl 5 and turned all the saftey and defueling off.
stock tranny. and that tranny will not lock the converter until OD, and will slip like no other and they are so inefficient.
i think i could easily get a 14
1990 sport RC SB, 1995 318drivetrain, 3.92 gears (came with truck) Powertrax "traction system", 95 dash/steering wheel, hearthrob exhaust, headers, cutout after y-pipe, necessary electric fan add-a-leafs, 30x9.5 mud tires, cranked T-bars, AR 39 15x8 rims, grill guard, roll bars
|
CTD5.9 Dodge Dakota JOIN HERE
3/24/2008 09:11:59
| RE: dakota vs mustang IP: Logged
Message: Yep, the CR engines start with more and are easier to get big numbers out of. I have a couple friends with 305cr engines that make in the 540rwhp range with a smarty and a pressure box. As for the trans I only lock up 1/2 way through third and in OD. Lock up is when the train gets moving.
We do dyno days often during the summer and the bulk of the group I run in makes 500 - 700 rwhp most are CR engines a couple are VP44 and last but not least the P-pump 12v engins. A P-pump was Queen of the Dyno at Fast in BC a couple weeks ago. Rhondas truck made 783RWHP with her 98 12v, her truck also runs mid 11.'s yup its a 4x4 QC LB.
If you have any questions on pressure boxes or injectors let me know. I have some friends at DDP & F1
|
Super bee GenI
3/25/2008 14:38:47
| RE: dakota vs mustang IP: Logged
Message: i would have to take a trip down to St. Lucas Iowa before i start thinking about that stuff
i just have the edge juice w/ attitude and an intake
long way to go before i start thinking about turbos, injectors, or other boxes/programers
1990 sport RC SB, 1995 318drivetrain, 3.92 gears (came with truck) Powertrax "traction system", 95 dash/steering wheel, hearthrob exhaust, headers, cutout after y-pipe, necessary electric fan add-a-leafs, 30x9.5 mud tires, cranked T-bars, AR 39 15x8 rims, grill guard, roll bars
|
Super bee GenI
3/25/2008 14:40:29
| RE: dakota vs mustang IP: Logged
Message: oh yeah
p-pump=love
all the really high Hp trucks are 12ers with a p-pump
i even see a few VP-44s ripped out and replaced with a P-pump
1990 sport RC SB, 1995 318drivetrain, 3.92 gears (came with truck) Powertrax "traction system", 95 dash/steering wheel, hearthrob exhaust, headers, cutout after y-pipe, necessary electric fan add-a-leafs, 30x9.5 mud tires, cranked T-bars, AR 39 15x8 rims, grill guard, roll bars
|
| <<Original Post <<Previous Page P 2 |
|
Post a reply to this message:
Username Registration: Optional All visitors are allowed to post messages
|