From | Message |
99yellow5.2 Dodge Dakota JOIN HERE
2/28/2007 13:04:30
|
Subject: races IP: Logged
Message: what are some of the races that you've won and what cars did you race against? anybody know why a 92 with a 5.2 is faster than a 99 with the 5.2 both are stock.
|
ryan Dodge Dakota JOIN HERE
2/28/2007 13:25:01
| RE: races IP: Logged
Message: 92 is way lighter than the 99.
|
jjj Dodge Dakota JOIN HERE
2/28/2007 21:13:58
| RE: races IP: Logged
Message: 92 put out more power also, better exhaust and computer map.
|
gen1dak Dodge Dakota JOIN HERE
2/28/2007 22:31:25
| RE: races IP: Logged
Message: Also, while gross lift was the same as later cams, the '92 had slightly more aggressive valve timing events. All-in-all, the '92 was the best setup.
|
4.7onN20 Dodge Dakota JOIN HERE
3/01/2007 01:37:53
| RE: races IP: Logged
Message: I got beat along time ago in my 91 camaro by a dak around that year. At the time I had no idea they were so quick. I was really mad because I was like 20 and the guy in the dak was like 40 and was laughing at me at the next light. LOL
|
Ky_man Dodge Dakota JOIN HERE
3/01/2007 01:44:56
| RE: races IP: Logged
Message: This might be off-topic, but do you think my 97 5.2 could outrun a
newer Ford Ranger with the V6 (4.0 or 3.0)? What about a 1989
Toyota Hilux with the 3.0 V6? Just wonderin'.
|
99yellow5.2 Dodge Dakota JOIN HERE
3/01/2007 13:13:04
| RE: races IP: Logged
Message: wow i had no idea that the 92 was so much better cause my buddy has one and i can never seem catch him he always beats my by one to one an a half truck lenghts the camero that i raced only beat me by about 3/4 of a lenght an it was a lightly modded 99 v6 auto
|
jasonC Dodge Dakota JOIN HERE
3/01/2007 20:03:28
| RE: races IP: Logged
Message: Ky-man
Ford 3.0L are so weak.And so is their older pushrod 4.0L.You will smoke either of them.
The ranger with the 4.0L overhead cam motor is a lot stronger than the older 4.0L.Havent seen them run .
|
ryan Dodge Dakota JOIN HERE
3/02/2007 00:50:03
| RE: races IP: Logged
Message: i raced a new ranger with the 3.0 and he ran a 17.8 and i ran a 17 flat, my trucks a 3.9
|
Shoe GenIII
3/02/2007 19:03:03
| RE: races IP: Logged
Message: I have seen 2.3 automatics out run 3.0 5speeds. They are so slow!!!!!!!!
'97 RC V6, 5spd, soon to be V8, 5spd!
|
1hotkadota Dodge Dakota JOIN HERE
3/02/2007 20:16:23
| RE: races IP: Logged
Message: I drive a 2.3L auto Ranger at work and that thing will move for a little 4 banger. When the transmission shifts the revs only drop to 4700 rpm before catching the next gear.
I wish my dak could shift like that. Ya think my 4.7 would break a ford ranger 5 speed tranny?
|
ramm Dodge Dakota JOIN HERE
3/28/2007 08:43:37
| RE: races IP: Logged
Message: my 1992 5.2 outran a 2003 4.0 ranger no problem
|
| P 1 |
|
Post a reply to this message:
Username Registration: Optional All visitors are allowed to post messages
|