| From | Message |
dodgeboy
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
5/10/2004
22:24:29
|
 Subject: RE: is this true?
IP: Logged
Message:
Daiy driver now,2.5L turbo one
still not as easy to work on as the dak
|
IntenseDak39
*GenIII*
5/10/2004
22:38:33
| RE: is this true?
IP: Logged
Message:
that 2.5 is a lot easier to maintian though!
man, this may seem funny but i want to get a early 80's aires station wagon and drop in a 300 hp super 60 turbo 2.2 in it. Man would that be bad news for some vettes out there!
6.6 Lt. Big Block, 727 TF shift kit, 452 heads, edelbrock 750 cfm, .513/.513 284/300 crower cam, comp cams springs, comp cams pushrods, 1.5 roller rockers, dp intake, mopar ignition, mopar windage tray, dual exhaust w/ 40 series flowmasters, 4.10 gears, coilover drag suspension, approx, 3500 lbs
|
another mark
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
5/10/2004
23:46:56
| RE: is this true?
IP: Logged
Message:
If I was driving a Vette I'd find it more embarassing to get beat by an A100.
|
dodgeboy
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
5/11/2004
06:20:57
| RE: is this true?
IP: Logged
Message:
ummm, whats that have to do with any thing?
there is a reliant wagon running around on the net with a turbo III motor in it. That super 60 package is crap now, alot better sh!t available now.
|
dodgeboy
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
5/11/2004
06:23:05
| RE: is this true?
IP: Logged
Message:
haha, guess I should read everything before I reply.
I think a reliant wagon would be wayyy worse than a a100.....
|
| | <<Oringinal Post <<Previous Page P 2 |
|
Post a reply to this message:
Username Registration: Optional
All visitors are allowed to post messages
|
