| From | Message |
3.9power
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
11/04/2003
09:54:19
|
 Subject: RE: Dakota vs C10
IP: Logged
Message:
Carbed has nothing to do with it. 2 bbl, 4 bbl, what heads 76cc? 64cc? comp ratio, intake runner size? m/t, a/t, crap torque converter? rear end? hooked up the 350 will burn you! stock esp. with a/t, 2bbl. low comp ratio, its a slug and you will embarass him. once i ran a guy with a beat up iroc z with the tpi 350. white trash camaro with glasspacks, sounded like crap but he said 350 this, 350 that, and i beat him with my dak v6.
|
3.9power
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
11/04/2003
11:00:23
|  RE: Dakota vs C10
IP: Logged
Message:
one more thing, why do you have to rag on the dynomax muffler, flowmaster is just more expensive, it wont make a difference. save up for a nitrous system... hehehe :)
|
go home
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
11/04/2003
12:16:56
| RE: Dakota vs C10
IP: Logged
Message:
I've had both on my truck thats why. The flow made more power and holds up better to the winter salt. I live in the ice box state and rust eats anything and the flow is holding up 10times better then the dynomax ever did
|
| | <<Oringinal Post <<Previous Page P 2 |
|
Post a reply to this message:
Username Registration: Optional
All visitors are allowed to post messages
|
