| From | Message |
dakkid
Dodge Dakota
12/02/2001
19:47:43
|
 Subject: Age Old Battle
IP: Logged
Message:
what is better for power?
a turbo
or a supercharger
with overall power output
|
CW
GenIII
 
12/02/2001
19:57:57
|  RE: Age Old Battle
IP: Logged
Message:
Personally I think the turbo. It is more complicated and usually more costly because there are few kits out there they usually have to be custom built. Speed tweaks I think is working on one for the v-6 and I would go for it if I were you.
2001 4.7 5sp 3.92 LSD sport plus
Ported throttle body, IAT adjuster, flowmaster cat back, adjusted TPS from .51v to .76v
Working on custom 4" cold air intake
|
bernd
*GenIII*
12/02/2001
20:10:55
| RE: Age Old Battle
IP: Logged
Message:
Both have their Pro's and Con's. It's budget and ease of installation dependent. (Ok..and if you want to have the only Turbo-Dak on your block.) ;)
Seriously though, it's been debated over the years and the Centrifugal Supercharger vs. Turbo debate has really not gotten anywhere at all. They both work very well.
1997 Dodge Dakota SLT - V6
Supercharged/Intercooled @ 10# w/Nitrous
14.93 @ 93.26mph
|
dakkid
Dodge Dakota
12/04/2001
20:17:04
| RE: Age Old Battle
IP: Logged
Message:
but out of the superchargers would u say the centrifugal is the best? power? powerband it works on?
also can i do a twin turbe setup with the right $$$?
|
bernd
*GenIII*
12/05/2001
00:24:26
| RE: Age Old Battle
IP: Logged
Message:
Yup...as compared to the screw type blowers, the centrifugal is much easier on your engine as well.
Yes, you can build a twin turbo setup for the V6...but it'll cost much more than a supercharger.
1997 Dodge Dakota SLT - V6
Supercharged/Intercooled @ 10# w/Nitrous
14.93 @ 93.26mph
|
dakkid
Dodge Dakota
12/05/2001
20:11:02
| RE: Age Old Battle
IP: Logged
Message:
would this gain signifgantly more hp/torque? (twinturbo)
|
| | P 1 |
|
Post a reply to this message:
Username Registration: Optional
All visitors are allowed to post messages
|
