Dodge Dakota ForumDodge Dakota PhotosDodgeDakota.net Membership
  Forums   Forum Tools
23:48:05 - 12/19/2024

V6 Dakotas
FromMessage
Xphile1999
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE


9/04/2002
10:26:08

Subject: I knew it was bad, but not this bad!
IP: Logged

Message:
Ok, so i just tried out 2 0-60 runs w/ the gtech i just got (thanks kota on 20s!!).

Its saying it is 12.36!!! (both times)

what could be going wrong????
i have a 00 RC 4x4 v6 5 speed w/ the following

high flow muff w/ catback system
homebrew intake
48 mm TB
1.7 RR
JBA headers
jet stage II
180 tstat

i need to try to get a 1/4 mile with out my radar alarm going off ;)

This worries me!!!
thanks for the input.

-Xphile1999




IntenseDak39
*GenIII*
 User Profile


9/04/2002
11:00:44

RE: I knew it was bad, but not this bad!
IP: Logged

Message:
just strap that nitrous on!

edelbrock intake, modified manifold, headers, flowmaster, 24lb injectors, mp throttle body, 1.7 rr, msd 6a, msd wires, blaster 3, b&m shifter, shift kit, coilovers, drag shocks, ladderbars, panhard bar, 150# coils, electric fan, oil cooler, 180 thermostat, autolite 3923, corbeau seats, slicks, mojo

kota on 20s
GenIII
 Email User Profile


9/04/2002
12:16:11

RE: I knew it was bad, but not this bad!
IP: Logged

Message:
you have to put it in the middle of the windshield, and when you are ready to go, the display has to be set at 0 if its +/- 1 or 2, it could throw it off

-Eric
Injection is nice, but i'd rather be blown.
5.2L, 5speed. Powerdyne SC, 50mm TB, 2bbl M-1, 1.7RR's, MSD 6BTM, ciramic JBA headers, carsound cat, dumped gibson

CW
GenIII
 Email User Profile


9/04/2002
14:33:28

RE: I knew it was bad, but not this bad!
IP: Logged

Message:
Make sure it is facing paralell to the direction of travel of the car as well.

2001 4.7 5sp 3.92 LSD
Ported 68mm TB, IAT adjuster, 3" flowmaster cat back, TPS @ .76V, 4" Z-tube, Roadmaster active suspention, Removed Third cat, Electric fan Convertion, HO cams, Robert shaw 180 therm, HO intake manifold.

Xphile1999
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE


9/04/2002
19:48:08

RE: I knew it was bad, but not this bad!
IP: Logged

Message:
I'm sure its not the gtech (i understand the concepts and the math behind it), i've just so fed up w/ this truck being this slow after all of the stuff i have done, it seems slower than stock now!

is this average???
is this reasonable for this kind of truck?

Any thoughts?

-X



LOGIC71B
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
 Email

9/05/2002
00:00:42

RE: I knew it was bad, but not this bad!
IP: Logged

Message:
Like IntenseDak39 stated: nitrous!

Sneeky Pete with a dry shot in the home brew intake tube should do the trick!



Kryp2nitE
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE


9/05/2002
15:17:14

RE: I knew it was bad, but not this bad!
IP: Logged

Message:
mabye youre were really timing 1/4 mile? :)



Dan
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE


9/06/2002
16:07:41

RE: I knew it was bad, but not this bad!
IP: Logged

Message:
were you going uphill?

i did a g-tech run downhill and said 0-60 in 7.3sec



92Dak
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE


9/06/2002
16:48:37

RE: I knew it was bad, but not this bad!
IP: Logged

Message:
Get someone to ride with you and time it with a stopwatch to see if the results are severely skewed.



   P 1


Post a reply to this message:

Username Registration: Optional
All visitors are allowed to post messages


Name:
Email:
Notify me when I get a reply to my message:Yes  No

Icons:            

          

Subject:
Message:
 



Home | Forums | Members | Pictures | Contact Us

This site is in no way affiliated with Chrysler or any of its subsidiaries.