Dodge Dakota ForumDodge Dakota PhotosDodgeDakota.net Membership
  Forums   Forum Tools
08:14:32 - 11/17/2024

Dakota Performance
FromMessage
BlkDak
Dodge Dakota


12/22/2001
05:40:52

Subject: Intense Vs. K&N
IP: Logged

Message:
I want to put an intake on my 3.9 00'
and i just want to be sure that i am getting the best intake for my truck..
How does the Intense intake compare to the K&N ?
I heard that the K&N has the plastic around the screws and they crack ? ?
any feedback would be helpful..
BlkDak



BlkDak
Dodge Dakota


12/23/2001
21:07:17

RE: Intense Vs. K&N
IP: Logged

Message:
anyone out there know about the intense compared to the K&N ?





ConnorR/T
Dodge Dakota
 Email

12/25/2001
10:38:35

RE: Intense Vs. K&N
IP: Logged

Message:
Started out with the IP stage II and upgraded to the stage III. The system is nice but I recently switched to the K&N Gen II. I can tell you that the power difference is very noticable with the K&N. The IP uses the stock airhat which is full of baffles and creates a total restriction to the flow going in. Also, the IP setup uses a 3" diameter intake tube that does have a bend while the K&N uses a 4" tube which is straight to the airhat that is restriction free. I actually fitted the stage III filter canister to my K&N tube and used the 9" bigmouth S&B cone filter instead of the 7" K&N.
There have been a few instances where the K&N tubes do crack, but K&N replaces them no questions asked...hence my new K&N tube. heh

Chris
Freeport, Tx
00 FR CC



   P 1


Post a reply to this message:

Username Registration: Optional
All visitors are allowed to post messages


Name:
Email:
Notify me when I get a reply to my message:Yes  No

Icons:            

Subject:
Message:
 



Home | Forums | Members | Pictures | Contact Us

This site is in no way affiliated with Chrysler or any of its subsidiaries.