From | Message |
Andrew Dodge Dakota JOIN HERE
8/09/2004 15:58:23
|
Subject: K&N vs. Intense Performance IP: Logged
Message: I am thinking of buying a CAI for my 1998 Dodge Dakota 5.2L and was wondering which CAI will perform better (K&N FIPK or IntensePerformance CAI). They cost about the same so that isn't an issue but I am just wondering what will work better for me.
Thanks
Andrew
|
prple-gaseatr Dodge Dakota JOIN HERE
8/09/2004 23:08:47
| RE: K&N vs. Intense Performance IP: Logged
Message: ditto...
|
Andrew Dodge Dakota JOIN HERE
8/10/2004 22:42:08
| RE: K&N vs. Intense Performance IP: Logged
Message: Could anyone help me out I am in need of some advice?? Please
|
The Dude Dodge Dakota JOIN HERE
8/11/2004 00:08:15
| RE: K&N vs. Intense Performance IP: Logged
Message: I have an Intense Performace on my 4.7 and I love it. No regrets.
|
Black R/T Dodge Dakota JOIN HERE
8/11/2004 11:23:40
| RE: K&N vs. Intense Performance IP: Logged
Message: I heard good things about both, I went with
K&N because they are a larger company and
have a little more research backing them, and
there intake looks a little more professional.
But im sure their both within a few ponies.
|
Andrew Dodge Dakota JOIN HERE
8/11/2004 11:26:45
| RE: K&N vs. Intense Performance IP: Logged
Message: Thanks for the help anyone have specific HP gains for either of the CAI. Not just from the website but from users actually doing Dyno tests.
|
wesb Dodge Dakota JOIN HERE ![Email](http://www.dodgedakota.net/amb/icons/email.gif)
8/12/2004 20:38:22
| RE: K&N vs. Intense Performance IP: Logged
Message: If you want more air flow try a larger filter not a smaller one that lets in a little dirt with the air.
Figure it out square inch wise.
Get a 3"x14" and get all the flow the motor can pump
and still keep the dirt out.
|
| P 1 |
|
Post a reply to this message:
Username Registration: Optional All visitors are allowed to post messages
|