Dodge Dakota ForumDodge Dakota PhotosDodgeDakota.net Membership
  Forums   Forum Tools
00:28:57 - 12/20/2024

General Dakota Board
FromMessage
trekx
Unregistered
 Email

3/17/2001
19:16:18

Subject: 2001 new interior
IP: Logged

Message:
whats up with the 2001 door panals?????

THAY SUCK!!!!!




Jethro HeeHaw
Unregistered
 Email

3/17/2001
21:35:12

RE: 2001 new interior
IP: Logged

Message:
(A collective groan as the the average intelligence of this list falls dramatically...)

Trekx, you have misspelled over 20% of your words, failed to quantify your complaint, and articulated at the level of a junior-high aged hillbilly. Care to try your luck again?



trekx
Unregistered
 Email

3/18/2001
10:08:34

RE: 2001 new interior
IP: Logged

Message:
Loser
The Subject was 2001 interior not how good is your spelling

Next time if you won't to reply read (if you can!) the subject first....

This is a board for Dakota lovers to have an intelligent chat about there trucks

Not to belittle them because there spelling is bad

Besides The spelling was bad because I posted it @1am before I went to bed and did not check it first Not that I owe you a reason why but it seams that it really disturbed you so there you go

You must be a ford owner because only a ford owner would be so petty. because he has a shity truck and is pissed off at the world.

trekx
2000 BLK DODGE DAKOTA OWNER





Jethro HeeHaw
Unregistered
 Email

3/18/2001
10:22:42

RE: 2001 new interior
IP: Logged

Message:
When you wrote won't (contraction for will not), did you mean "want"?
When you wrote there, did you mean "their"?
When you wrote seams, which are where two materials come together and form a bond, did you mean "seems"?
When you wrote shity, did you mean "shitty"?

I'm actually quite a happy poster, not pissed off at anyone. I just can't understand how a person can write such a hollow, meaningless statement as "these door panels suck." Umm, just what exactly sucks about them? What problem were you having? Maybe if you described that, and possibly asked for input from others, in the true tradition of a mailing list, you might get a more peaceful reply...

Jethro the Banjo Player
(with the blue ticks in the back)



trekx
Dakota Enthusiast
 Email User Profile

3/18/2001
10:40:27

RE: 2001 new interior
IP: Logged

Message:
To make ford owning HeeHaw hillbilly happy
Im reposting my massage...
(Seeing he has nothing better to do then check peoples spelling)

What’s up with the 2001 door panels?????

They Suck!!!!

(Ok hillbilly heehaw better feel free to check it god forbid I misspell a word..)




Jethro HeeHaw
Unregistered
 Email

3/18/2001
11:05:38

RE: 2001 new interior
IP: Logged

Message:
HAA!!

I'll use all caps, just so you can hear me more clearly (for the 3rd time)--

HEY!! JUST WHAT IS YOUR PROBLEM WITH THE DOOR PANELS? PLEASE. PLEASE!!! TELL US WHY YOU THINK THEY SUCK. WHAT HAPPENED? BE!!!! SPECIFIC!!!

(sheesh...)



trekx
Dakota Enthusiast
 Email User Profile

3/18/2001
11:35:19

RE: 2001 new interior
IP: Logged

Message:
Ackally it was (What’s up with the 2001 door panels They Suck.) and if you don't understand than your dummer than you’re accusing me of being.
It means I really dislike the new 2001 dodge Dakota door panels I find them plan and quite unappealing i.e. they suck. da

Besides
As long as I get my point across Dose anyone really give a fuck About my spelling
My only advise to you is seek some help for this problem of yours. Before it really gets out of hand
Not every one has perfect spelling live with it.

These boards are for fun not legal form.

Get a life and stop checking everyone’s spelling
If I want spell check ill ask for it..

so please don't check my spelling for I fear it may add to your condition.

good luck





trekx
DakotaEnthusiast
 Email User Profile

3/18/2001
11:48:34

RE: 2001 new interior
IP: Logged

Message:
Hey I just wont people’s input of what they think of the new 2001 interior and to say that I dislike the door panels.

so chil





jf
Unregistered
 Email

3/18/2001
12:25:40

RE: 2001 new interior
IP: Logged

Message:
I really like the new interior of my cc sport truck. very roomy and quite.the door panels have incredible storage capacity and feel solid.my only gripe is that the vents dont blow fresh air in unless the fan is turned on.other flaws include pcv hose was diconected and factory production papers were cramed into intake / exhaust manifold, potential fire hazard.



ZENDAK99
Unregistered
 Email

3/18/2001
16:17:54

RE: 2001 new interior
IP: Logged

Message:
Trekx I agree with you......2001 door panels are quite different. I love the 1997 to 2000 door panels. But hell its a Dakota and its all good.
As for the spell correct idiot....Be real, who cares if the spelling is bad, you replied to the post...

ZeNdaK99
99 FR CC R/T
Many mods and many more to come.



albert
Unregistered
 Email

3/18/2001
20:40:45

RE: 2001 new interior
IP: Logged

Message:
I agree with you trekx, I have a 00 dakota and when I saw the 01, I really disliked them. Seems like they're cheaper too. The doorlocks are smaller and look cheap and there isn't even the little light around the keyhole any more. These small changes make a big difference when the manufacturer shows regress instead of progress.



Jethros Dad
Unregistered


3/18/2001
21:09:44

RE: 2001 new interior
IP: Logged

Message:
Jethro, quit hassling the poor spelling guy, didn't your mamma teach you not to say anything if you don't have anything good to say? Wait, maybe I should ask Trekx that????



Uncle Jed
Unregistered


3/18/2001
22:05:10

RE: 2001 new interior
IP: Logged

Message:
I thunk Jethro has a ligetumite staitmunt. I meen cumm on, if yo caint' iven asc a kwestun why evn poste on the borde?

Gimme a damn break. Speak english. I think this board is full of intelligent people asking good questions and getting good questions. Just ask your question and be done with it. The way I see it - if you don't like the door panels in the 2001's, go buy yourself a PRE-2001 model.
Sheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeesh.



trekx
DakotaEnthusiast
 Email User Profile

3/18/2001
22:24:26

RE: 2001 new interior
IP: Logged

Message:
Jethro HeeHaw

Why don't you stop posting as other people and drop your dumb ass trip if you don’t have an option on the topic stay the fuck off the boards.

trekx
2000 blk dak
(Or for real idiots: I own a year 2000 black dodge Dakota)



ZENDAK99
Unregistered
 Email

3/18/2001
22:33:00

RE: 2001 new interior
IP: Logged

Message:
HAHAHAHAHAHHA
99 CC FR R/T



hojo
GenI
 Email User Profile

3/19/2001
11:00:34

RE: 2001 new interior
IP: Logged

Message:
I have the 2001 and I dont really see how my doors "SUCK". I havent seen a 2000 or earlier though, so I cant compare. I do like the huge storage compartments on the bottom though.

Steve
2001 Patriot Blue 4x4 ClubCab
SLT Plus, 4.7

BillyBob
Unregistered


3/25/2001
10:59:55

RE: 2001 new interior
IP: Logged

Message:
trekx, you said that this forum was for inteligent conversation. From where I sit you show lack of intelligence when you can't spell or use the King's English properly to express yourself. trekx, you need to learn spelling and grammer to represent yourself as intelligent, you have used not spelling nor grammer so you can't possibly be intelligent.



trekx
DakotaEnthusiast
 Email User Profile

3/25/2001
12:32:19

RE: 2001 new interior
IP: Logged

Message:
Well from where I sit you’re not to intelligent
You’re self if you don’t know how to follow simple instructions as I said a week ago.

"Why don't you stop posting as other people and drop your dumb ass trip if you don’t have an option on the topic stay the fuck off the boards."

DO YOU UNDERSTAND OR DO I HAVE TO UPLOAD SOME IDIOT PIX???

POST YOUR OPINION ON THE SHITTY DOOR PANELS OR SHUT THE FUCK UP!!!!

OK



trekx
2000 Black Dakota Ext. Cab


   P 1


Post a reply to this message:

Username Registration: Optional
All visitors are allowed to post messages


Name:
Email:
Notify me when I get a reply to my message:Yes  No

Subject:
Message:
 



Home | Forums | Members | Pictures | Contact Us

This site is in no way affiliated with Chrysler or any of its subsidiaries.