Dodge Dakota ForumDodge Dakota PhotosDodgeDakota.net Membership
  Forums   Forum Tools
00:43:39 - 12/20/2024

General Dakota Board
FromMessage
Reapist
Gen I
 Email User Profile


10/24/2007
14:09:23

Subject: Couple of issues with my 94 Dak
IP: Logged

Message:
w/5.2...

I've had it since it was new and it's always used a fair bit of oil and the AC has never blown cold air...just mildly cool air.

About the AC, I think it uses freon that's not very good. They were having to experiment with a lot of different things in that era with freons and paints. Anyone ever find a good solution? Can a more effecient freon be used in the system of am I forever stuck with a subpar AC system?

The oil...there's a tiny bit of drippage at the drain plug. If I use a new drain plug gasket at each change it helps only a slight bit. Still, it uses far too much oil. one thing I wonder is if the PCV valve is too close to the oil spray under the valve cover. Will a taller valve cover with a baffle inside at the PCV hole stop this? Or how about using a tube at the cover and moving the valve a could of inches away from the cover? Or is the oil consumption an entirely different issue that the Mopar worl is aware of?

Thanks.



Curly
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE


10/24/2007
14:47:11

RE: Couple of issues with my 94 Dak
IP: Logged

Message:
ever check the plenum gasket ?



Reapist
Gen I
 Email User Profile


10/24/2007
17:06:46

RE: Couple of issues with my 94 Dak
IP: Logged

Message:
No, but it has always pinged really bad. I never knew what to do about that but I've recently read on here that could be an issue.



Curly
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE


10/24/2007
17:09:06

RE: Couple of issues with my 94 Dak
IP: Logged

Message:
truck not running of course
hold the throttle open
look down the throttle with a flash light
look for oil residue and or gunk



Reapist
Gen I
 Email User Profile


10/25/2007
11:36:55

RE: Couple of issues with my 94 Dak
IP: Logged

Message:
What a quandry. I always said when the warranty expired I would put the performance cam in it. But, 155,000 miles later it's still stock. Now I am of a mind to wait untill the 5.2 expires and put in a 5.9. Maybe stroked, maybe not. I'm not without funds, but I'm also a cheapskate. I have a hard time justifying replacing something that's working fine.

I would like to go on and put the M1 on, but it's not cheap and the 5.2 would probably suffer on the bottom end. On the flip side. when I do put a new motor in I will use the M1. So now I have to decide if I keep dumping oil in it and running on the best gas I can buy until it dies or spend a weekend fixing the factory intake.

Aside from being able to run cheaper gas and use less oil will I realize any difference in performance? I have ceramic coated headers on the way to me now and will run a new exhaust from front to back, but I really don't want to do anything that will not benefit me when I eventually change the engine.

It's looking tho like I might still get another 150K miles out of it so maybe I should fix the leak in the plenum gasket.



jayb
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE


10/28/2007
20:17:51

RE: Couple of issues with my 94 Dak
IP: Logged

Message:
I would fix it. the 5.9 is a gas pig. with the prices now, would you really need that power? do you really want it enough to suffer 14-15 mpg on the highway? my 93 5.2 4x4 gets 19mpg+ on the highway and i wouldnt want any less.



OBIO3
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE


10/29/2007
01:51:52

RE: Couple of issues with my 94 Dak
IP: Logged

Message:
I'm wondering if the PCV valve as ever been changed and if it has with what. After market PCV valves are a poor choice for the Dakotas. Original Mopars cost more but do work proper. Could well be your oil problem. If I was to guess, I would say your plenum gasket has been defective sense day one going with your saying it has always used oil and severe pinging condition.








   P 1


Post a reply to this message:

Username Registration: Optional
All visitors are allowed to post messages


Name:
Email:
Notify me when I get a reply to my message:Yes  No

Icons:            

          

Subject:
Message:
 



Home | Forums | Members | Pictures | Contact Us

This site is in no way affiliated with Chrysler or any of its subsidiaries.