Dodge Dakota ForumDodge Dakota PhotosDodgeDakota.net Membership
  Forums   Forum Tools
03:16:36 - 12/24/2024

General Dakota Board
FromMessage
T-4 Mike
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
 Email

8/03/2007
15:38:56

Subject: Add-a-Leaf OR Lifting Block?
IP: Logged

Message:
I have a 1994 that I am wanting to lift. Which is better for an rear lift? I am looking into cranking up my torsion bars on the front end and I trying to find out which is a better way to lift the rear. Add-a-Leaf or Blocks?

Thanks,
Mike



Forseti
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE


8/03/2007
16:42:14

RE: Add-a-Leaf OR Lifting Block?
IP: Logged

Message:
shackle and hanger ...



Marv
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE


8/03/2007
19:54:33

RE: Add-a-Leaf OR Lifting Block?
IP: Logged

Message:
A 4-inch longer spring shackle will give you 2 inches of lift, not significantly change spring rate, and will not change bed load-carrying capacity.
A 2-inch block will give 2 inches of lift. Again, with no appreciable change in spring rate, and no change to weight carrying capacity, but will increase spring wrap.
Add-a-leaf will raise the rear, possibly make the rear end ride a bit stiffer, will increase load-carrying capacity and, depending on type of add-a-leaf, may reduce spring wrap.
Roadmaster Active Suspension will raise the rear a bit, increase the apparent spring rate a bit, increase load-carrying capacity, and significantly reduce spring wrap.




Kowalski
GenIII
 User Profile


8/04/2007
08:43:49

RE: Add-a-Leaf OR Lifting Block?
IP: Logged

Message:
Excellent explanation; and why I went with RAS. It also seems to ride less stiffly than add a leafs I've used in the past, but still a bit stiffer than stock.

Lead, follow, or get out of the way

   P 1


Post a reply to this message:

Username Registration: Optional
All visitors are allowed to post messages


Name:
Email:
Notify me when I get a reply to my message:Yes  No

Icons:            

          

Subject:
Message:
 



Home | Forums | Members | Pictures | Contact Us

This site is in no way affiliated with Chrysler or any of its subsidiaries.