| From | Message |
Ronder
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
9/06/2005
10:05:33
|
 Subject: RE: Amsoil = Better Fuel Economy ... and MPG
IP: Logged
Message:
Amsoil 2000,0w-30 And Amsoil severe 75w-90 rear end, trip mileage-
2000 Dakota (club), 6, auto, 3.92 rear end, bed cover
Did the up north MN road trip (twin cities to park rapids, MN) Friday afternoon... stop and go on Hy 10 till after Clearwater MN. 65-70 mph from then on. Had about 150 lbs of "Stuff" in the bed.
The last 80 miles were straight into a 30 mph head wind.
21.5 mpg....I think that was pretty good considering all the factors (Speed, traffic and wind) of the trip!
Ronder
PS. Tranny Fluid is next.
|
frank
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
9/06/2005
10:22:28
| RE: Amsoil = Better Fuel Economy ... and MPG
IP: Logged
Message:
WTF does that prove? Any other oil may of had the same damn results. You guys are such blind suckers for this sh!t.
|
Ronder
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
9/06/2005
20:05:31
| RE: Amsoil = Better Fuel Economy ... and MPG
IP: Logged
Message:
Why are U looking at this thread for frankie?
I am sure U "lube up" with whatever is on the night stand!
Ronder
|
simon
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
9/06/2005
22:14:12
| RE: Amsoil = Better Fuel Economy ... and MPG
IP: Logged
Message:
superior base oils and additives = amsoil
not all beer is the same.
not all burgers are the same.
not all oils are the same.
superior base oils and additives = amsoil
|
Brainwashed
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
9/07/2005
00:19:47
| RE: Amsoil = Better Fuel Economy ... and MPG
IP: Logged
Message:
Rah Rah Rah
|
another1
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
9/11/2006
14:19:53
| RE: Amsoil = Better Fuel Economy ... and MPG
IP: Logged
Message:
Spaminator missed one.
But I found it.
|
Spaminator
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
9/11/2006
14:37:17
| RE: Amsoil = Better Fuel Economy ... and MPG
IP: Logged
Message:
Thanks
|
| | <<Original Post <<Previous Page P 2 |
|
Post a reply to this message:
Username Registration: Optional
All visitors are allowed to post messages
|
