Dodge Dakota ForumDodge Dakota PhotosDodgeDakota.net Membership
  Forums   Forum Tools
00:37:36 - 12/20/2024

General Dakota Board
FromMessage
01Motorsport
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE


9/05/2004
18:41:00

Subject: '05 Motorweek road test
IP: Logged

Message:
Saturday (9/4) Motorweek #2401 on PBS TV ran a road test of the new 2005 Dakota, a SLT 4x4 Quad Cab 4.7 230HP. 0-60 in 9.3 sec., and 17.2 sec.@ 80mph in the 1/4. $26,809 on the sticker. Motorweek noted the "brawnier" styling, where "The protuding front looks like the result of a bar room brawl." LMAO! Read the report on www.pbs.org/mpt/motorweek, or check the Speed Channel for other showings this week.



Justi
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE


9/06/2004
11:55:34

RE: '05 Motorweek road test
IP: Logged

Message:
That was 100% an advertisement, certainly not an article. The one negative thing (which oddly is the only thing 01Motorsport decided to quote is quickly excused in the article.

I'm all for advertisemtns, but in a periodical that is supposed to offer unbiased opinion of a product it's very disappointing. I don't mind a just the facts presentation, nor do I mind an opinion filled presentation. However, if it's going to be of the opinion variety then it should offer both sides of the coin. Very disappointing...



cj
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE


9/06/2004
15:38:28

RE: '05 Motorweek road test
IP: Logged

Message:
o-60 in 9.3 seconds w/ a 4.7? wow how heavvy is that hunk o junk?



01Motorsport
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE


9/07/2004
10:03:09

RE: '05 Motorweek road test
IP: Logged

Message:
I thought Motorweek did a good "nuts and bolts" presentation for the time they allowed. Not ragging on the 2005 Dak; I'm for sizing up a live example. Anyway, no more "lightweight" Dakotas. The 2005 specs just came up on www.dodge.com. The truck on Motorweek weighs 4567 pounds, curiously only 67 pounds more than a 2004 4x4 SLT QC. However, the SAD part is that a 2005 4x2 CC weighs 4275, 300 pounds MORE than a 2004 at 3971 to 4035 curb weight. Performance and mpg take a beating.



CThomp
*GenIII*
 User Profile


9/07/2004
12:26:34

RE: '05 Motorweek road test
IP: Logged

Message:
Yeah I definitely don't get why they keep making are trucks heavier.



Patriot QC
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE


9/07/2004
22:20:46

RE: '05 Motorweek road test
IP: Logged

Message:
Herein may lie the answer for the slow 0-60 times.

"While a 6-speed manual is standard, our SLT V-8 had a 5-speed heavy duty automatic with Tow/Haul mode, the only smaller truck with that feature, as well as our truck's available full-time hi-lo four-wheel drive transfer case."





deerridge
GenIII
 User Profile


9/08/2004
11:22:48

RE: '05 Motorweek road test
IP: Logged

Message:
Sorry, the answer is the weight. My 03 Rc Awd 4.7 will do it in 7.8 with 15.8 through the quarter. That extra 500 lbs is alot.

Real Horsepower

Patriot QC
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE


9/08/2004
13:17:45

RE: '05 Motorweek road test
IP: Logged

Message:
Deerridge, is yours a 4-wheel drive or do you have the street version of AWD (ie like the GMC Syclone had)? I don't remember the article stating what axle the 05 had or the diameter of the tires installed. These could affect the acceleration as well.



DEERRIDGE
GenIII
 User Profile


9/08/2004
14:09:09

RE: '05 Motorweek road test
IP: Logged

Message:
Its' the full time AWD and I also have the LSD. I have a friend with a old Ram 1500 with it and a 400 cu in motor. He has 465K on the odometer so I expect mine will last. YOu can't spin the wheels and its really hard to loose traction. I've only had to use my 4wd a couple times in real deep mud and extra steep slopes. It seems to grab at all four corners on good roads. Great for towing. I'm really pleased with it.

Real Horsepower

   P 1


Post a reply to this message:

Username Registration: Optional
All visitors are allowed to post messages


Name:
Email:
Notify me when I get a reply to my message:Yes  No

Icons:            

          

Subject:
Message:
 



Home | Forums | Members | Pictures | Contact Us

This site is in no way affiliated with Chrysler or any of its subsidiaries.