Dodge Dakota ForumDodge Dakota PhotosDodgeDakota.net Membership
  Forums   Forum Tools
03:01:09 - 12/29/2024

Dakota Performance
FromMessage
Tom Byrne
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
 Email

3/13/2003
10:10:58

Subject: 340
IP: Logged

Message:
I have a chance to get a 340 and 727 trans both rebuilt at a good price. Any thought sor problems with dropping this in my 89 Shelby?



Dave W
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
 Email

3/13/2003
14:38:37

RE: 340
IP: Logged

Message:
The 340 has a larger bore and shorter stroke then the 360 and breathes better, I had an Aspen R/T that had a 360 and I dropped in a 340 to replace it. I had to put all the smog stuff back on it because of emission testing up here in Connecticut but it pulled a lot harder then the 360.



gtsdart
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
 Email

3/13/2003
14:47:26

RE: 340
IP: Logged

Message:
Yeah the 340 does pull much harder than the 360. Especially a built one.



Tom Byrne
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
 Email

3/13/2003
15:49:45

RE: 340
IP: Logged

Message:
I am emissions exempt no testing in my area of PA as I am rural.



brian 02 rt
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
 Email

3/13/2003
21:19:13

RE: 340
IP: Logged

Message:
340`s as far as I remember had a problem with starving a few bearings of oil. Make sure it was built right. Personaly I think you can do a lot more with a 360



Jason Teague
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
 Email

3/14/2003
00:05:15

RE: 340
IP: Logged

Message:
What year is the 340? The pre '72 340's were best. The 340 is IMHO the best small block ever made. It has been known to embarrass many big block cars on the dragstrip. The 360 is more of a lower reving torque motor, while the 340 likes to be reved high. As far as the 340 having an oiling problem, I and my father have raced them for years with noting more than a deep pan and a HV/HP pump with aboslutely no bearing problems. The 360s oiling system is the same except for the 360 has larger main journals. The only prob should be the left motormount 318s are different from 340/360s.



slopehead
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE


3/15/2003
01:44:34

RE: 340
IP: Logged

Message:
is my memory right in that the 89 shelby is really just a warmed over omni 2 door fastback? if it is it would be kinda hard to drop a rear driver into a front drive chassis.



FazDak
GenII
 User Profile


3/15/2003
09:39:38

RE: 340
IP: Logged

Message:
I may be wrong but I think he's talkin about a Shelby Dak. Which I would love to have!
The 318 TB engine in em is pretty weak and that 340 will wake it up quite a bit but plan on going carb'd instead of the stock TB as that setup will starve a 340 of fuel.
You will need a good fuel pressure regulator and a MP electronic conversion kit.

I have a pre mag V8 Im thinkin of droppin in my Dak so I have researched it completely.

Good luck.



Tom Byrne
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
 Email

3/17/2003
18:52:33

RE: 340
IP: Logged

Message:
Yes 89 Shelby Dakota. If it were a "warmed over
hatchback" it would be in the high 14's stock and in the
12's for $1000 to $1500 more.



litlpunisher
GenIII
 User Profile


3/18/2003
08:09:29

RE: 340
IP: Logged

Message:
340 having bearing problems? I don't think so. Like the 318 and slant six the 340 are just about indestructable. If the 360 was that much better i would have put a 360 fi in my truck instead of the 340. The 340 made 425h 425 ftlb of torque.

98 Dakota
Bottle fed 340ci


   P 1


Post a reply to this message:

Username Registration: Optional
All visitors are allowed to post messages


Name:
Email:
Notify me when I get a reply to my message:Yes  No

Icons:            

          

Subject:
Message:
 



Home | Forums | Members | Pictures | Contact Us

This site is in no way affiliated with Chrysler or any of its subsidiaries.