Dodge Dakota ForumDodge Dakota PhotosDodgeDakota.net Membership
  Forums   Forum Tools
02:50:29 - 12/29/2024

Dakota Performance
FromMessage
madak
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
 Email

2/16/2003
11:34:16

Subject: Stainless Vs. Aluminized exhaust
IP: Logged

Message:
o.k....I'm going to get a new exhaust for my '99
Dakota (5.2, 4X4) this spring . I've had it since
March of that year and it has 50,XXX miles. Is
it worth the extra bucks for a stainless system
or is wise to just get a aluminized system?
For example.. a Borla or MBRP stainless
single are roughly $400. 00, while the MBRP
alum. dual is $350.00 and the Spintech alum.
systems are even less than that. If anyone
has any experience, I'd appreciate your
thoughts.
P.S> As I look out the window at the snow
falling, I'm going to let you know that I do live in
a winter weather area where the roads are
treated on days like today.



Derik
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
 Email

2/16/2003
13:08:54

RE: Stainless Vs. Aluminized exhaust
IP: Logged

Message:
Defiantly go with stainless, it will last a lot longer. Worth the extra bucks. I’m sure glad I did!



Cal Dak
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE


2/16/2003
20:20:25

RE: Stainless Vs. Aluminized exhaust
IP: Logged

Message:
definetly use the stainless, a little more now, but in the long run after the aluminum has rotted away due to rust, it will pay itself off.



LI Blackdakk
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
 Email

2/17/2003
16:41:01

RE: Stainless Vs. Aluminized exhaust
IP: Logged

Message:
i say aluminum...of course my aluminumized cat-back is someone elses problem now...lol



   P 1


Post a reply to this message:

Username Registration: Optional
All visitors are allowed to post messages


Name:
Email:
Notify me when I get a reply to my message:Yes  No

Icons:            

          

Subject:
Message:
 



Home | Forums | Members | Pictures | Contact Us

This site is in no way affiliated with Chrysler or any of its subsidiaries.