| From | Message |
CHAD
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
4/22/2002
22:59:37
|
 Subject: s-10
IP: Logged
Message:
Anyone stock got wooped by a stock s-10??? about the same year vehicles. Man I got a 93 basiclly stock. The only thing I got is a K&N and I warmed up a 99 S-10
|
LI Blackdak
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
4/23/2002
05:55:25
| RE: s-10
IP: Logged
Message:
heres the thing...
gen 1 and 2 can beat s10s
gen 3 can only take newer s10s i think cause they were faster in the early to mid 90s
is this right???
i know no normal gen 3 V6 can take a 94 2700 lb 185 hp s10
|
Chris
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
4/23/2002
22:07:56
| RE: s-10
IP: Logged
Message:
I raped the sh!t out of a 98 s-10 and I'm gen3... No way does a s-10 hold a candle to my dodges ass.. No way in hell..
--
Chris
|
LI Blackdak
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
4/23/2002
22:12:35
| RE: s-10
IP: Logged
Message:
the newer s10s weigh more...try to beat a mid 90s 2wd.
|
n8 dawg
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
4/23/2002
22:18:11
| RE: s-10
IP: Logged
Message:
well i killed all 4 older s10's i have raced 94 and lower.....the were all about a lenght behind me.....hope my tailgate was clean =)
|
LI Blackdak
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
4/23/2002
23:04:48
| RE: s-10
IP: Logged
Message:
oh yeah...i guess 4x4s just cant beat 2x4s...lol
|
Fubar512
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
4/23/2002
23:44:22
| RE: s-10
IP: Logged
Message:
Where did you get that 2700 lb. curb weight from?
I remember weighing my '86 S10 V-6 Automatic (with a fiberglass cap) and it came out to something line 3400 lbs.
Older S10s aren't that light, and the 94s and up are even heavier.
I remember a Dakota ad from the early 90s (around 94) where they compared the performance of the Dak V-6 against the S10's V6, and Dodge claimed the Gen II was almost 1/2 a second faster in the quarter. Experience at the track bears this out.
Allowing for the 300-400 lb weight difference of the Gen III vs the Gen IIs, it should be a close race, at best (assuming 1/10 of a sec disadvantage for every 100 lbs of weight added).
Also, Chevy's 4.3 is the most rough running, unbalanced V-6 on the market. That's why the had to put balance shafts in them!
|
LI Blackdak
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
4/24/2002
00:20:16
| RE: s-10
IP: Logged
Message:
well lets see...where did i get it...let me think real hard now....how about off the F'in door!!!
|
Fubar512
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
4/24/2002
01:32:08
| RE: s-10
IP: Logged
Message:
Well, that being the case, someone is wrong. Go to this URL:
http://auto.consumerguide.com/auto/new/reviews/full/index.cfm/id/20791.htm#specifications
BTW, the weight listed is for an I-4 with manual trans and standard equipment.
'nuff said
|
LI Blackdak
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
4/24/2002
02:33:49
| RE: s-10
IP: Logged
Message:
TALIKIN ABOUT 94 S10
|
Fubar512
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
4/24/2002
19:12:19
| RE: s-10
IP: Logged
Message:
Dude....the current S10 body style has been in production since the '94 model year.
The orginal style S10 was produced from '82 thru '93.
http://s10planet.com/history_s10.htm
|
LI Blackdak
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
4/24/2002
22:12:25
| RE: s-10
IP: Logged
Message:
i saw what i saw
|
| | P 1 |
|
Post a reply to this message:
Username Registration: Optional
All visitors are allowed to post messages
|
