Dodge Dakota ForumDodge Dakota PhotosDodgeDakota.net Membership
  Forums   Forum Tools
02:31:05 - 12/29/2024

Dakota Performance
FromMessage
conig
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
 Email

1/09/2002
21:46:10

Subject: splitsecond vs. roeracing engine control
IP: Logged

Message:
whats the diff between the splitsecond fuel tunerfound her http://www.splitsec.com/
and the roe racing engine controler they even have the same air to fuel ratio gauge. what would the expected gains of one of these be?

by the way roe racing controller can be found here http://www.krcperformance.com/krc_performance_pcm.htm

all info is appreciated



CW
GenIII
 Email User Profile


1/09/2002
22:32:45

RE: splitsecond vs. roeracing engine control
IP: Logged

Message:
I think it is some company that is just redistributing the split second controller. Like Mopar selling the K&N FIPK under the mopar name.

2001 RC 4.7 5sp 9.25" 3.92 LSD
Ported throttle body, IAT adjuster, 3" flowmaster cat back, TPS @ .76V, 4" cold air, roadmaster active suspention

CW
GenIII
 Email User Profile


1/09/2002
22:35:09

RE: splitsecond vs. roeracing engine control
IP: Logged

Message:
You have a truck just like mine right? If you get this before me let me know how it works I think the 4.7 is a little lean. But I can't get anyone to varify this.

2001 RC 4.7 5sp 9.25" 3.92 LSD
Ported throttle body, IAT adjuster, 3" flowmaster cat back, TPS @ .76V, 4" cold air, roadmaster active suspention

bernd
*GenIII*
 Email User Profile


1/10/2002
01:25:20

RE: splitsecond vs. roeracing engine control
IP: Logged

Message:
Same thing.

1997 Dodge Dakota SLT - V6
Supercharged/Intercooled @ 10# w/Nitrous
14.65 @ 95.01mph

conig
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
 Email

1/10/2002
13:27:05

RE: splitsecond vs. roeracing engine control
IP: Logged

Message:
I thought it was to rich but have never verified this. lol now i'm completely lost.

bearnd how would one of these compare to a perforance flash



conig
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
 Email

1/10/2002
17:54:28

RE: splitsecond vs. roeracing engine control
IP: Logged

Message:
00 cc 4.7l auto 3.55 homebrew intake, no stickers, clearcorners, euros, grill.
sort of like yours but hey if it works on my engine it will work on yours!
just trying to decide if a kennebell pcm or one of these is best for me. I love tunable things for some reason



CW
GenIII
 Email User Profile


1/10/2002
20:27:14

RE: splitsecond vs. roeracing engine control
IP: Logged

Message:
I measured O2 sensor readings on a stock 5.9 and the reading was .94 volts quite rich but responds better to mods. My 4.7 with the mods on it right now is sitting at .86 volts which is leaner. But I am not sure if it is a little to lean because I know it doesn't respond to mods like the 360. I asked around on another site and a guy with a fairly well modded 5.9 said his 02 sensor readings were at .94 as well (richer than mine).
Oh well Guess I will have to find out myself. Personaly I think freeing up the exhaust and adding a little fuel will work well on the 4.7.

2001 RC 4.7 5sp 9.25" 3.92 LSD
Ported throttle body, IAT adjuster, 3" flowmaster cat back, TPS @ .76V, 4" cold air, roadmaster active suspention

conig
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
 Email

1/11/2002
18:27:46

RE: splitsecond vs. roeracing engine control
IP: Logged

Message:
I agree the 4.7l like almost any engine should benifit from an exhaust system and less backpressure. people need to remember back pressure doesn't increase or keep torque. exhaust velocity does whats the easiest way to keep velocity up? add back pressure kinda like a pressure nozzle on your garden hose.

with vering info I "plan" to just send my pcm to kenne bell probable monday. hopefully with good results. but first I'd like to do an exhaust system but can't decide how I should do it.



CW
GenIII
 Email User Profile


1/11/2002
20:02:42

RE: splitsecond vs. roeracing engine control
IP: Logged

Message:
Personaly I am not ot worried about loosing a little torque down low. This truck has a 15.68:1 final drive ratio in first gear. That is a ton of multiplication. I want to push the power so that it pulls all the way to 6000 if I can. Think I will need cams for that though.
Bernd anything good to say on the turbo yet?

2001 RC 4.7 5sp 9.25" 3.92 LSD
Ported throttle body, IAT adjuster, 3" flowmaster cat back, TPS @ .76V, 4" cold air, roadmaster active suspention

   P 1


Post a reply to this message:

Username Registration: Optional
All visitors are allowed to post messages


Name:
Email:
Notify me when I get a reply to my message:Yes  No

Icons:            

Subject:
Message:
 



Home | Forums | Members | Pictures | Contact Us

This site is in no way affiliated with Chrysler or any of its subsidiaries.