| From | Message |
BlkDak
Dodge Dakota
12/22/2001
05:40:52
|
 Subject: Intense Vs. K&N
IP: Logged
Message:
I want to put an intake on my 3.9 00'
and i just want to be sure that i am getting the best intake for my truck..
How does the Intense intake compare to the K&N ?
I heard that the K&N has the plastic around the screws and they crack ? ?
any feedback would be helpful..
BlkDak
|
BlkDak
Dodge Dakota
12/23/2001
21:07:17
| RE: Intense Vs. K&N
IP: Logged
Message:
anyone out there know about the intense compared to the K&N ?
|
ConnorR/T
Dodge Dakota
12/25/2001
10:38:35
| RE: Intense Vs. K&N
IP: Logged
Message:
Started out with the IP stage II and upgraded to the stage III. The system is nice but I recently switched to the K&N Gen II. I can tell you that the power difference is very noticable with the K&N. The IP uses the stock airhat which is full of baffles and creates a total restriction to the flow going in. Also, the IP setup uses a 3" diameter intake tube that does have a bend while the K&N uses a 4" tube which is straight to the airhat that is restriction free. I actually fitted the stage III filter canister to my K&N tube and used the 9" bigmouth S&B cone filter instead of the 7" K&N.
There have been a few instances where the K&N tubes do crack, but K&N replaces them no questions asked...hence my new K&N tube. heh
Chris
Freeport, Tx
00 FR CC
|
| | P 1 |
|
Post a reply to this message:
Username Registration: Optional
All visitors are allowed to post messages
|
