Dodge Dakota ForumDodge Dakota PhotosDodgeDakota.net Membership
  Forums   Forum Tools
02:52:00 - 12/29/2024

Dakota Performance
FromMessage
Nick A.
Dodge Dakota
 Email

11/24/2001
01:15:51

Subject: NEGATIVE ON THE 3293's for 1999 5.2
IP: Logged

Message:
The plug app. for the 99 w/ 5.2 is 5224 and I cant run the 3293 but you can use them for the year 00 w/5.2 or the 4.7!!! I dont know why they did that???? This info is right out of this years AUTOLIGHT APPLICATION BOOK. There was a defenit difference in plug length between the two #'s . Anyone else run into this problem!!!????



SLEEPER318
Dodge Dakota
 Email

11/24/2001
10:03:32

RE: NEGATIVE ON THE 3293's for 1999 5.2
IP: Logged

Message:
ok, i have them in my 98 5.2. ask for them and throw them in. there 5/8 plugs. they'll work.




Nick A.
Dodge Dakota
 Email

11/26/2001
21:56:22

RE: NEGATIVE ON THE 3293's for 1999 5.2
IP: Logged

Message:
Did you notice any difference with motor ping and knock? Does anyone out there have a 99 5.2 with the 3293's installed. I need to be reasured for some reason.



Wayne
Dodge Dakota
 Email

11/27/2001
10:48:41

RE: NEGATIVE ON THE 3293's for 1999 5.2
IP: Logged

Message:
I have a '99 5.2 and I have run them in my truck. It runs better and that is track proven. The only difference is they don't reach in the cylinder as far. I pulled them out to try out a set of my favorite brand of plugs which is NGK. I am using 1 step colder and they run just as well as the 3923s



Nick A.
Dodge Dakota
 Email

11/27/2001
20:40:37

RE: NEGATIVE ON THE 3293's for 1999 5.2
IP: Logged

Message:
Thanks for the reply!! I didn't mean to list this heading 3 times. Sorry




   P 1


Post a reply to this message:

Username Registration: Optional
All visitors are allowed to post messages


Name:
Email:
Notify me when I get a reply to my message:Yes  No

Icons:            

Subject:
Message:
 



Home | Forums | Members | Pictures | Contact Us

This site is in no way affiliated with Chrysler or any of its subsidiaries.