From | Message |
Jon Dodge Dakota
10/31/2001 15:26:27
|
Subject: Why wouldn't This work IP: Logged
Message: http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=597329456
heres the link. Looks the same as Intense Performance, way cheaper. Other than the tube being plastic I think it would make as much power. Then with a little custom work I could make a heat shield. What do you guys think?
|
Blizzard *GenIII*
10/31/2001 16:28:49
| RE: Why wouldn't This work IP: Logged
Message: If you're looking for the cheap way out, why not just make your own? It's just PVC pipe, some elbows, and a filter.
'01 QC 4x4 5.9L, 3.92 LSD, loaded http://shakin-notstirred.tripod.com
|
DakGuy Dodge Dakota
10/31/2001 16:49:43
| RE: Why wouldn't This work IP: Logged
Message: I made my own and it works good. Any body with oposing thumbs can do it. Just get some 3 inch PVC and 2 elbos dry fit it first mark it and then take it out of the truck and glue.
|
Jon Dodge Dakota
10/31/2001 17:07:09
| RE: Why wouldn't This work IP: Logged
Message: I would like to make a model of this on my own. I just wondered if it will make power and torque. My stock truck feels like it is being plugged up. The beast needs to be unleashed.
|
Bruce P Dodge Dakota
10/31/2001 20:26:04
| POWERBAND CHANGES IP: Logged
Message: Most folks have reported that removing the stock air plenum (It has 'blind' passageways in it for tuning) will REDUCE low-end grunt.
Going with a system such as the following will REDUCE lowRPM grunt and improve power above 3K RPM.
http://volantperformance.com/index.html
http://www.intenseperformance.com/
http://www.geocities.com/intense79/intake.html
http://members.home.net/blhamm/coldair.htm
http://members.aol.com/bsbets/truck/intake1.jpg
|
Bruce P Dodge Dakota
10/31/2001 20:32:54
| I COPIED THIS IP: Logged
Message: BTW...This is what I have now. I copied this WEB page exactly as you see it here. (Less than $20 at Home Depot)
http://members.aol.com/bsbets/truck/intake1.jpg
I plan on going with a different airfilter at some point so it will SOUND better.
|
BB2DAK Dodge Dakota
11/04/2001 18:21:43
| RE: Why wouldn't This work IP: Logged
Message: I made a few more changes to the intake on my
truck to make is more of a "cold-air" intake
system.
I removed the rubber flap on the passenger side
and extended the air intake to the grille using
aluminum ducting, and some plastic water piping.
I also installed an aluminum heat shield.
The shield is used to keep hot air being moved
by the fan away from the air input area.
See the pictures below:
http://members.aol.com/bsbets/truck/intake5.jpg
http://members.aol.com/bsbets/truck/intake4.jpg
http://members.aol.com/bsbets/truck/intake3.jpg
http://members.aol.com/bsbets/truck/intake2.jpg
http://members.aol.com/bsbets/truck/intake1.jpg
|
Fild Dodge Dakota
11/04/2001 19:57:19
| RE: Why wouldn't This work IP: Logged
Message: I seen on another post where the stock air hat had a baffle in it. Would using the air hat and K&N cone filter(removing the stock filter box) be about the same as going the whole route of going all the way to the TB be OK for normal driving. I've heard going with the fernco and bend from the TB was a little noisy. I am just looking for a little better, easier running engine and am not a racer. Bottom line question? Is it worth going from the TB with a Z-tube setup or installing a bend at the flex tube coming out of the factory air plentum/removing the filter box and instaling a cone filter.
|
| P 1 |
|
Post a reply to this message:
Username Registration: Optional All visitors are allowed to post messages
|