Dodge Dakota ForumDodge Dakota PhotosDodgeDakota.net Membership
  Forums   Forum Tools
03:31:56 - 12/29/2024

Dakota Performance
FromMessage
99 Blue R/T
Dodge Dakota
 Email

10/19/2001
16:25:21

Subject: 180 vs. 160
IP: Logged

Message:
I have a 160 thermastat now in my truck. Nobody says anything about the 160, is it good or bad? I am very curious. Most of the dakotas I read about have 180's, but they dont say why they used them and not the 160. What can any of you tell me about either of them?

Thanks for all of your input.



Marc 99 R/T
Dodge Dakota
 Email

10/19/2001
16:54:07

RE: 180 vs. 160
IP: Logged

Message:
Some of the computer code out with a 160 thermastat



99 Blue R/T
Dodge Dakota
 Email

10/19/2001
17:01:20

RE: 180 vs. 160
IP: Logged

Message:
What do you mean code out? I have not had any codes or anything come up yet.



ib01r/t
Dodge Dakota
 Email

10/19/2001
17:06:28

RE: 180 vs. 160
IP: Logged

Message:
I use the 160 also with no problems



jASON
Dodge Dakota


10/19/2001
18:02:02

RE: 180 vs. 160
IP: Logged

Message:
I got the 160 too. No probs yet. Did notice a slight performance increase (this may have been psychological) after changing form the stock unit.

My truck runs like a champ.



alshadow
Dodge Dakota
 Email

10/21/2001
23:51:18

RE: 180 vs. 160
IP: Logged

Message:
Put a 160 in a 98 w/ a Kenne Bell supercharger. KB recommended this as part of their "Big Gulp" option.

Engine definately ran cooler and did seem to help w/ performance. However, after a month or so I begin to get code of engine running too cool.

Put 180 back in and cleared up problem. I could have probably stayed w/ 160 but I didn't like the check engine light on all the time.



Wayne
Dodge Dakota


10/22/2001
13:07:07

RE: 180 vs. 160
IP: Logged

Message:
A '99 will run fine with a 160 and set no codes. Older computers would set a code and run very rich. I don't know what year it changed but the newer ones just compensate for the lower temp. I ran a 160 for several months in my '99 5.2. Couldn't tell a performance difference. I went back to the 180 because it took too long to warm the cab up on a winter day.



   P 1


Post a reply to this message:

Username Registration: Optional
All visitors are allowed to post messages


Name:
Email:
Notify me when I get a reply to my message:Yes  No

Icons:            

Subject:
Message:
 



Home | Forums | Members | Pictures | Contact Us

This site is in no way affiliated with Chrysler or any of its subsidiaries.