Dodge Dakota ForumDodge Dakota PhotosDodgeDakota.net Membership
  Forums   Forum Tools
03:33:41 - 12/29/2024

Dakota Performance
FromMessage
Dr.Q
Dodge Dakota


8/20/2001
18:31:08

Subject: '01RC 4.7 5sp 3.92 LSD Numbers?
IP: Logged

Message:
Just wondering what kind of numbers anybody with this set up has? In three tries with the wife and a stop watch 0-60 (7.0-7.2). But her reaction time may be a little slow. Although if I strapped her to the back bumper she could provide a little more traction...Hmmmm



Dr.Q
Dodge Dakota


8/20/2001
22:32:09

RE: '01RC 4.7 5sp 3.92 LSD Numbers?
IP: Logged

Message:
NOBODY has any info? Jeffster, don't you have this set up? Beuller? Anyone? Anyone?



Duner
Dodge Dakota


8/20/2001
22:39:58

RE: '01RC 4.7 5sp 3.92 LSD Numbers?
IP: Logged

Message:
Hahahaha

I have no idea what any of them do the 0-60 in. That's some BS numbers that magazines like to throw around. When you go to the track you get different incrementals on your time slips. On my truck, the speedo and tach are actually dampened and slow. You will actually be past 60 mph before your speedo shows it if you are flooring it. Some people with G-Techs could probably give you some numbers but who knows how accurate it would be. What part of the country do you live in? Is there any tracks near you?



kicker01
Dodge Dakota
 Email

8/20/2001
23:35:22

RE: '01RC 4.7 5sp 3.92 LSD Numbers?
IP: Logged

Message:
is it possible to calculate 0-60 from a timeslip?



Matt Barret
Dodge Dakota
 Email

8/21/2001
07:50:38

RE: '01RC 4.7 5sp 3.92 LSD Numbers?
IP: Logged

Message:
1/8 mile 9.4 @ 74 mph (completely stock)
1/8 mile 9.0 @ 76 mph (with mods and slicks)

If you work these numbers based on a constant acceleration, (which is not true) you'd get 0-60 numbers in the mid/low 7's. I'd say it's safe to say low 7's for a stock 4.7l RC 5spd, if traction is very good. With Mods and slicks, well into the 6's 0-60 mph with very good traction (1.9 or less 60' time)
Not bad for something that weights almost 2 tons, and has the aerodynamics of a brick ;)


BTW, I'll be testing the F&B 70mm TB starting this week, hope to get to the dyno within the next 2 weeks. I decided to put the stock 65mm TB back on, pull the dyno, then try out the 70mm F&B TB to see what we gain, stay tuned......

Matt Y2K-HEMI
'00 RC 4.7L 5spd
14.23 @ 94.49



Dr.Q
Dodge Dakota


8/21/2001
08:11:15

RE: '01RC 4.7 5sp 3.92 LSD Numbers?
IP: Logged

Message:
Thanx,
I was just wondering since this seems to be the quickest set up where it would fall in the big picture. You know faster than a 5.0 slower than a Camaro. I was really surprised to find out that its acceleration was so good. Go figure, I managed to sneak something as fast as a mustang past the old lady!



Dr.Q
Dodge Dakota


8/21/2001
08:13:23

RE: '01RC 4.7 5sp 3.92 LSD Numbers?
IP: Logged

Message:
Thanx,
I was just wondering since this seems to be the quickest set up where it would fall in the big picture. You know faster than a 5.0 slower than a Camaro. I was really surprised to find out that its acceleration was so good. Go figure, I managed to sneak something as fast as a mustang past the old lady!



   P 1


Post a reply to this message:

Username Registration: Optional
All visitors are allowed to post messages


Name:
Email:
Notify me when I get a reply to my message:Yes  No

Icons:            

Subject:
Message:
 



Home | Forums | Members | Pictures | Contact Us

This site is in no way affiliated with Chrysler or any of its subsidiaries.