| From | Message |
TexasTodd
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
1/09/2004
17:22:50
|
 Subject: RE: 4.7 Vs. 5.9
IP: Logged
Message:
Yea, that rocking must be a problem.
Try new sway bars, front and rear.
|
maybe
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
1/10/2004
08:12:52
|  RE: 4.7 Vs. 5.9
IP: Logged
Message:
he means like that chevy rock.... poor guy !
|
YAAAABUDDY03
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
1/10/2004
16:20:53
| RE: 4.7 Vs. 5.9
IP: Logged
Message:
YEAH!!!!!!!!!
Chevy... like a rock!
"wait, you mean it just sits there? I'd rather be different, and own a dodge than be built ford tough, which contradicts itself"
Paul
I don't care who ya are...... thats funny!!!!
|
Mad Dakota
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
8/20/2005
11:24:02
|  RE: 4.7 Vs. 5.9
IP: Logged
Message:
I have a 2002 Quadcab 4x4 with a 5.9 and iblow the doors off 4.7 futher moor 4.7 are garbge ihavent heard of a stock 4.7 doing 116 m.p.h iwill take any 4.7 on and beat the heal out of it and chevy suck try me !!! you all should talk more trash. Mad Dakota
|
GraphiteDak
GenIII
8/20/2005
12:45:27
| RE: 4.7 Vs. 5.9
IP: Logged
Message:
Dude! That post was almost 2 yrs old!!!!!!
But since you said it, My 4.7 pulled me to 125 yesterday on the freeway with plenty of power and gearing left to go when I let off!
Stock it did 120MPH before it hit a limiter. So 116 was possible even back then. And it's 4WD :)
Some people have a 96 or whatever stock MPH limiter. Not sure why. I hear it's with the aluminum driveshaft or something. But just know, they are NOT all the same. Has nothing to do with the engine.
Both engines are good. 4.7 is just more modern and is not garbage by any means. It is pretty much EASIER to work on as well. I know that will start arguments. But I've worked on LA engines in the past, and I've got a 4.7 now. I was surprised myself once I took the wrench to my 4.7
|
Mad Dakota
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
8/20/2005
13:03:04
|  RE: 4.7 Vs. 5.9
IP: Logged
Message:
IT looks like garbge thats my thought you wish it would do 120 mph dont you think your bitting on a big bone for such a littel4.7 Ill dualt you could get a 100 mph. Mad Dakota
|
Kowalski
GenIII
8/20/2005
14:18:30
| RE: 4.7 Vs. 5.9
IP: Logged
Message:
I think I get it Graphite - he's using "mad" in the older sense of the word - like insane...
Lead, follow, or get out of the way
|
BubbainGE
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
8/20/2005
15:39:37
| RE: 4.7 Vs. 5.9
IP: Logged
Message:
Mad Dakota; If you're gonna insult folks, at least try not to misspell all your insults. Here's a link to help you;
http://www.m-w.com/dictionary.htm
Wasn't sure if you could nug out Websters Dictionary in a search engine, so I did it for you.
|
GraphiteDak
GenIII
8/20/2005
21:07:24
| RE: 4.7 Vs. 5.9
IP: Logged
Message:
I bet $100 my 4WD 4.7 would do a higher top speed than MAD Dakota's!
If he knew enough to get his truck to break 120, he'd know the 4.7 and some skill could do it as well.
Why don't you put up and post a picture and video of your mighty truck??? (probably owns a 1990 Honda Civic).
If you can, then I'll go find some safe un occupied highway to take a video of mine burying the 120 speedo!
Hell, I'll plug my onscreen GPS in and record that speedo as it aproaches 140MPH and ask if your Dak can do that?
I really have no reason to go 140.
But at least I am sure I could prove it.
You could even put your rear axle on jack stands and record it in gear without really moving. The speed limiter would still cut it off where ever it is.
|
| | <<Previous Page P 5 Next Page>> |
