| From | Message |
Reapist
Gen I
 
10/23/2007
14:27:30
|
 Subject: RT or Edelbrock heads?
IP: Logged
Message:
I think the Edelbrocks may actually be a bit cheaper. I have the 5.2 right now but plan on a 5.9 in the future. It's a 94 Dakota.
So, R/T heads (big valve or small?) or the Edelbrock Magnum heads?
|
gen1dak
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
10/23/2007
14:55:57
|  RE: RT or Edelbrock heads?
IP: Logged
Message:
Depends on what else you're gonna do to it.
|
Shoe
GenIII
10/26/2007
12:18:32
| RE: RT or Edelbrock heads?
IP: Logged
Message:
I believe that everybody I have talked to says that nothing out flows a set of Eddys. I could be mistaken though.
Finally... a V8. '01 Dodge Dakota RC, 4.7, 5-speed, 3.92 LSD. = R/T Killer.
well at least a stock one
|
Edys
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
10/26/2007
16:13:47
| RE: RT or Edelbrock heads?
IP: Logged
Message:
and we make so much more then cylinder heads
http://www.edys.com/main/index.asp?b=105
|
Reapist
Gen I
11/01/2007
10:11:37
| RE: RT or Edelbrock heads?
IP: Logged
Message:
I call dibs on that!
|
question
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
11/08/2007
09:02:54
| RE: RT or Edelbrock heads?
IP: Logged
Message:
the R/T heads aluminum?
|
Reapist
Gen I
11/08/2007
10:21:50
| RE: RT or Edelbrock heads?
IP: Logged
Message:
The R/T heads come in both cast and aluminum. The Aluminum R/T's are pretty spendy.
|
KJ
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
11/10/2007
17:41:12
| RE: RT or Edelbrock heads?
IP: Logged
Message:
I would use Edelbrock Performer RPM heads if they will fit that application. The Performer RPM intake is a nice piece also.I'm putting one on a warmed-up 440.
|
K VILLE
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
11/12/2007
14:46:08
| EDELBROCK HEADS SUCK!
IP: Logged
Message:
I had a lot of truble with tham in 2002!
http://www.hotrodders.com/forum/edelbrock-heads-i-need-help-2105.html
https://www.dodgedakota.net/boards/per/1602.html
|
| | P 1 |
|
Post a reply to this message:
Username Registration: Optional
All visitors are allowed to post messages
|
