Forums
Forum Tools
|
 |
03:17:17 - 12/29/2024
Dakota Performance
| From | Message |
jasonC
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
8/24/2007
09:30:20
|
 Subject: Dyno proof?
IP: Logged
Message:
Does anyone have any dyno runs where they tested things like the M1 intake,and throttle body spacer,larger throttle body,cold air intakes,or any other popular mods?
|
1hotkadota
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
8/24/2007
13:33:32
|  RE: Dyno proof?
IP: Logged
Message:
Throttle body spacers are the biggest loads of crap out there. DO NOT WASTE YOUR MONEY!
|
TexasTodd
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
8/27/2007
08:08:06
|  RE: Dyno proof?
IP: Logged
Message:
I have dyno runs, that I posted over a year ago, mostly on the Superchips tuner. All three settings, over two different times, with the second on premium gas, for the PERF and towing setting. I already had HO cams, HO intake, ported TB, no third cat, and no belt driven fan, or fan clutch.
I can only objectively help on the 4.7 beast.
P.S.- Best run, the way I drive it everyday, (no short belts, etc.) was:
RWHP-227
RWTQ-300
Rear Wheel!!
|
1hotkadota
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
8/27/2007
14:22:51
| RE: Dyno proof?
IP: Logged
Message:
Those are really good numbers Todd.
What year is your truck and how hard was the HO intake install and how did you like it?
|
TexasTodd
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
8/29/2007
14:40:05
| RE: Dyno proof?
IP: Logged
Message:
I have a 2001, 4.7, manual, 2wd, QC, (has the two piece drive shaft, which reduces your RW #'s slightly.)
the HO intake is really easy to install, someone in 2002 dynoed before and after intakes, and it moved the torque curve over to the higher R's slightly, and it also raised the totals slightly.
I really couldn't tell the difference, but it was along time ago. I'm considering putting my non HO back on, to see if I feel 'feel' more low end torque.
|
| | P 1 |
|
Post a reply to this message:
Username Registration: Optional
All visitors are allowed to post messages
|
|
