| From | Message |
BlackM/Sstick
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
10/17/2006
13:02:23
|
 Subject: RE: 3.9 vs. 4.7
IP: Logged
Message:
You mean No-tune 4.8.. Ever notice how the R/T people just do not like 4.7s. They even side with chevys over the 7s.
|
2002 R/T
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
10/17/2006
14:30:55
| RE: 3.9 vs. 4.7
IP: Logged
Message:
well if i had to choose over another R/T vs 4.7 5spd vs 4.8 5spd i would take the chevy. just because the way they respond to heads and cam and all other bolt ons. you should check out streetfire.net or dragtruck and see the fast silverados out there. but then theres the lightning that can go in the 11's fairly easy.
|
2002 R/T
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
10/17/2006
14:36:44
| RE: 3.9 vs. 4.7
IP: Logged
Message:
you guys can see my r/t on dragtruck nuffsaid
http://www.dragtruck.com/ENTRIES/LTALGI68L8OY.html
|
Fed
GenII
 
10/17/2006
15:52:27
|  RE: 3.9 vs. 4.7
IP: Logged
Message:
and the 5.9 or 4.7 doesnt respond well to heads/cam/ bolt ons either??
im pretty sure they respond just as well as the chevy, yet
mopars are more reliable
theres a guy on www.krcperformance.com with a 600 hp 4.7
1993 Dakota CC 3.9 auto
(Rebuilt engine, 19 lb. injectors, ignition & wires, 4.10 gears, LSD
exhaust, intake, lowered 4/4, rear anti-sway bar)
|
?????
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
10/17/2006
16:46:04
| RE: 3.9 vs. 4.7
IP: Logged
Message:
If you think the chevys are so wonderful-go away and buy one.
|
Jerry
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
10/17/2006
19:00:25
| RE: 3.9 vs. 4.7
IP: Logged
Message:
I am sorry just how are Mopar's more reliable then Chevy's? Don't be biased that equals ignorance which then equals uneducated. Not saying Dodge is bad hell the 318 is a dam good motor but........
|
toolfan
GenIII
10/17/2006
20:37:51
| RE: 3.9 vs. 4.7
IP: Logged
Message:
if the 4.7 dakota beats the 5.2 dakota and the 5.2 dakota beats the 5.3 chevy and the 5.3 has more power than the 4.8 than what makes you think the 4.8 chevy stands a chance against the 4.7?mmm
i even raced a 5.3 chevy with a 4.6L v8 ford explorer and walked away from the thing.
nice looking truck 2002 R/T
|
2002 R/T
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
10/17/2006
23:17:19
| RE: 3.9 vs. 4.7
IP: Logged
Message:
actually the 3.8/5.3 respond way better to bolt ons than 4.7/5.2/5,9 heads and cam on the magnum motors barely make around 320 at the wheels. iv seen lots of 5.3's with heads and came push around 370 at the wheels
|
Fed
GenII
10/18/2006
00:39:46
| RE: 3.9 vs. 4.7
IP: Logged
Message:
i believe most motors respond very well to a good rebuild by someone
who knows what they are doing
look at Larry from J & J auto, hes got a V6 3.9 i tell you...
putting down 309 hp at the wheels
imagine if that puppy had 2 more cylinders
now tell me mopars dont respond as well as chevys with performance parts...
why give chevy props here, we dont wanna hear that ---youre on dodge dakota
board and your truck is quick
bragg and talk about your truck instead man!
1993 Dakota CC 3.9 auto
(Rebuilt engine, 19 lb. injectors, ignition & wires, 4.10 gears, LSD
exhaust, intake, lowered 4/4, rear anti-sway bar)
|
??????
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
10/18/2006
12:10:19
| RE: 3.9 vs. 4.7
IP: Logged
Message:
Let me guess, RT. You are between 18 to 21. Plus your buds all drive chevys....Go play on the chevy forms for awhile.
|
STS
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
10/18/2006
14:56:31
| RE: 3.9 vs. 4.7
IP: Logged
Message:
Lets stick to the subject!
Ok 239vs287..
Just depends on the modle of the truck.. I'll take a 239 if its a pre 97.. However, I'll exept the 4.7V6 only if I had a 5 or 6 speed manuel.
|
What ?
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
10/18/2006
16:56:20
| RE: 3.9 vs. 4.7
IP: Logged
Message:
STS - I can't understand most of what you're trying to say there - but you couldn't choose the 4.7 pre '97 anyway. It wasn't offered in a Dak until '00 !
|
2002 R/T
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
10/18/2006
21:56:14
| RE: 3.9 vs. 4.7
IP: Logged
Message:
lets face it guys, my R/T will most of you here. hahaha
|
5.2 dak
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
10/19/2006
12:22:43
| RE: 3.9 vs. 4.7
IP: Logged
Message:
My dak runs 13.1 all motor. The kid across the street has a LX 5.0 pony and runs 12.9. He has $3000.00 in his whole car. Sounds like the kid has the last lol plus the best bang for the buck.
|
2002 R/T
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
10/19/2006
14:01:38
| RE: 3.9 vs. 4.7
IP: Logged
Message:
i think FED is just jealous because he has a v6 dakota
|
Fed
GenII
10/19/2006
15:45:44
| RE: 3.9 vs. 4.7
IP: Logged
Message:
haha yeah thats it.. im jealous
I chose to keep my 3.9
1993 Dakota CC 3.9 auto
(Rebuilt engine, 19 lb. injectors, ignition & wires, 4.10 gears, LSD
exhaust, intake, lowered 4/4, rear anti-sway bar)
|
2002 R/T
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
10/20/2006
12:13:49
| RE: 3.9 vs. 4.7
IP: Logged
Message:
haha yea aint talkin no more, are you!
|
Fed
GenII
10/21/2006
08:58:26
| RE: 3.9 vs. 4.7
IP: Logged
Message:
well... seeing that this thread is accomplishing absolutely nothing, yes
and also seeing that you have been pretty darn criticized for
buttlovin them chevys so much (on a dodge forum...clearly unacceptable)
I thought i'd just give ya a break.
but uhh, stay smart and keep that R/T will ya
1993 Dakota CC 3.9 auto
(Rebuilt engine, 19 lb. injectors, ignition & wires, 4.10 gears, LSD
exhaust, intake, lowered 4/4, rear anti-sway bar)
|
Richard
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
10/27/2006
22:04:53
| RE: 3.9 vs. 4.7
IP: Logged
Message:
I have a 1997 Dodge Dakota RC V6 5-speed and I can outrun full-size Chevys. They are not that fast. So I am sure that if I can outrun one, than the V8s should have no problem handling one.
|
Jerry
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
10/27/2006
22:14:53
| RE: 3.9 vs. 4.7
IP: Logged
Message:
Yeah maybe full size Chevy's with a v6 no way your beating a v8.
|
| | <<Previous Page P 4 Next Page>> |
