| From | Message |
Andrew
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
8/09/2004
15:58:23
|
 Subject: K&N vs. Intense Performance
IP: Logged
Message:
I am thinking of buying a CAI for my 1998 Dodge Dakota 5.2L and was wondering which CAI will perform better (K&N FIPK or IntensePerformance CAI). They cost about the same so that isn't an issue but I am just wondering what will work better for me.
Thanks
Andrew
|
prple-gaseatr
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
8/09/2004
23:08:47
| RE: K&N vs. Intense Performance
IP: Logged
Message:
ditto...
|
Andrew
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
8/10/2004
22:42:08
| RE: K&N vs. Intense Performance
IP: Logged
Message:
Could anyone help me out I am in need of some advice?? Please
|
The Dude
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
8/11/2004
00:08:15
| RE: K&N vs. Intense Performance
IP: Logged
Message:
I have an Intense Performace on my 4.7 and I love it. No regrets.
|
Black R/T
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
8/11/2004
11:23:40
| RE: K&N vs. Intense Performance
IP: Logged
Message:
I heard good things about both, I went with
K&N because they are a larger company and
have a little more research backing them, and
there intake looks a little more professional.
But im sure their both within a few ponies.
|
Andrew
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
8/11/2004
11:26:45
|  RE: K&N vs. Intense Performance
IP: Logged
Message:
Thanks for the help anyone have specific HP gains for either of the CAI. Not just from the website but from users actually doing Dyno tests.
|
wesb
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
8/12/2004
20:38:22
| RE: K&N vs. Intense Performance
IP: Logged
Message:
If you want more air flow try a larger filter not a smaller one that lets in a little dirt with the air.
Figure it out square inch wise.
Get a 3"x14" and get all the flow the motor can pump
and still keep the dirt out.
|
| | P 1 |
|
Post a reply to this message:
Username Registration: Optional
All visitors are allowed to post messages
|
